เชิงอรรถและอ้างอิง ของ Humphrey_field_analyser

  1. 1 2 Landers, John; Sharma, Alok; Goldberg, Ivan; Graham, Stuart L (February 2010). "A comparison of visual field sensitivities between the Medmont automated perimeter and the Humphrey field analyzer". Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9071.2010.02246.x.
  2. Kedar, Sachin; Ghate, Deepta; Corbett, James J (2011). "Visual fields in neuro-ophthalmology". Indian Journal of Ophthalmology. 59 (2): 103. doi:10.4103/0301-4738.77013.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Kanski, J. J.,; Bowling, B. (2011). Clinical Ophthalmology. Edinburgh: Elsevier Saunders.
  4. Asaoka, Ryo; Vavvas, Demetrios (2014-06-20). "Mapping Glaucoma Patients' 30-2 and 10-2 Visual Fields Reveals Clusters of Test Points Damaged in the 10-2 Grid That Are Not Sampled in the Sparse 30-2 Grid". PLoS ONE. 9 (6): e98525. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0098525. PMC 4064971. PMID 24950300.
  5. 1 2 Khoury, Johnny, M.; Donahue, Sean, P.; Lavin, Patric, J.; Tsai, James (1999). "Comparison of 24-2 and 30-2 Perimetry in Glaucomatous and Nonglaucomatous Optic Neuropathies". Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology. 19 (2): 100–108. doi:10.1097/00041327-199906000-00004.
  6. 1 2 Nouri-Mahdavi, Kouros (December 2014). "Selecting visual field tests and assessing visual field deterioration in glaucoma". Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology. 49 (6): 497–505. doi:10.1016/j.jcjo.2014.10.002.
  7. Huang, Charles Q.; Carolan, James; Redline, Daniel; Taravati, Parisa; Woodward, Kimberly R.; Johnson, Chris A.; Wall, Michael; Keltner, John L. (2008-03-01). "Humphrey Matrix Perimetry in Optic Nerve and Chiasmal Disorders: Comparison with Humphrey SITA Standard 24-2". Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 49 (3): 917–23. doi:10.1167/iovs.07-0241. PMID 18326712.
  8. 1 2 Bengtsson, Boel; Olsson, Jonny; Heijl, Anders; Rootzén, Holger (2009-05-27). "A new generation of algorithms for computerized threshold perimetry, SITA". Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica. 75 (4): 368–375. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0420.1997.tb00392.x.
  9. 1 2 Szatmáry, Gabriella (2002-09-01). "Can Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm Fast Perimetry Be Used as an Alternative to Goldmann Perimetry in Neuro-ophthalmic Practice?". Archives of Ophthalmology. 120 (9): 1162. doi:10.1001/archopht.120.9.1162.
  10. "Vic Driving Vision Standards". Optometry Australia. Optometry Australia. Archived from the original on 2016-04-18.
  11. "Visual impairment". VicRoads. State Government of Victoria. 2015. Archived from the original on 2019-02-28.
  12. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Artes, Paul H (2012). Humphrey Field Analyzer II-i series User Manual. Carl Zeiss Meditec.
  13. Bengtsson, B; Heijl, A (2000). "False-negative responses in glaucoma perimetry: indicators of patient performance or test reliability?". Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 41 (8): 2201–2204.
  14. McKendrick, Allison M.; Denniss, Jonathan; Turpin, Andrew (August 2014). "Response times across the visual field: Empirical observations and application to threshold determination". Vision Research. 101: 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2014.04.013. PMID 24802595.
  15. Johnson, Chris A; Keltner, John L; Cello, Kimberly E; Edwards, Mary; Kass, Michael A; Gordon, Mae O; Budenz, Donald L; Gaasterland, Douglas E; Werner, Elliot (March 2002). "Baseline visual field characteristics in the ocular hypertension treatment study". Ophthalmology. 109 (3): 432–437. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(01)00948-4.
  16. 1 2 Wyatt, Harry J.; Dul, Mitchell W.; Swanson, William H. (March 2007). "Variability of visual field measurements is correlated with the gradient of visual sensitivity". Vision Research. 47 (7): 925–936. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2006.12.012. PMC 2094527. PMID 17320924.
  17. "centrocecal scotoma". Medical Dictionary. 2009. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2019-03-07. A defect in vision that is oval-shaped and includes the fixation point and the blind spot of the eye.
  18. Cubbidge, R (2012). "Essentials of visual field assessment". The Optician. 243 (6356): 14–16.
  19. Chen, Yi-Hao; Wu, Jian-Nan; Chen, Jiann-Torng; Lu, Da-Wen (2008). "Comparison of the Humphrey Field Analyser and Humphrey Matrix Perimeter for the Evaluation of Glaucoma Patients". Ophthalmologica. 222 (6): 400–407. doi:10.1159/000154203.
  20. Stamper, Robert L; Lieberman, Marc F; Drake, Michael V (2009). Becker-Shaffer's diagnosis and therapy of the glaucomas (8th ed.). [Edinburgh]: Mosby/Elsevier. ISBN 978-0-323-02394-8.
  21. 1 2 Ishiyama, Y.; Murata, H.; Mayama, C.; Asaoka, R. (2014-11-11). "An Objective Evaluation of Gaze Tracking in Humphrey Perimetry and the Relation With the Reproducibility of Visual Fields: A Pilot Study in Glaucoma". Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 55 (12): 8149–8152. doi:10.1167/iovs.14-15541. PMID 25389198.
  22. Horton, M. (2015). "10 tips for improving visual fields: perimetry may seem like second nature, but these recommendations can help you obtain better results by refining your understanding of the technology". Review of Optometry. 152 (4): 62.
  23. Kuzhuppilly, N; Patil, S; Dev, S; Deo, A (2018). "Reliability of Visual Field Index in Staging Glaucomatous Visual Field Damage". Journal of Clinical & Diagnostic Research. 12 (6): NC05–NC08.CS1 maint: Uses authors parameter (link)
  24. Saigal, Rahul. "Learning Effects and Artefacts in Automated Perimetry" (PDF). Association Of Optometry Ireland.
  25. Donahue, Sean. P., (1998). "Lens Holder Artifact Simulating Glaucomatous Defect in Automated Perimetry". JAMA Ophthalmology. 116 (12): 1681–1683. doi:10.1001/archopht.116.12.1681.

แหล่งที่มา

WikiPedia: Humphrey_field_analyser http://go.galegroup.com.ez.library.latrobe.edu.au/... http://search.proquest.com.ez.library.latrobe.edu.... http://www.optometry.org.au/vic/practice-info/driv... http://archopht.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?artic... //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2094527 //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4064971 //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17320924 //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18326712 //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24802595 //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24950300