อ้างอิง ของ ภัยพิบัตินิวเคลียร์ฟูกูชิมะแห่งที่หนึ่ง

Notes

  1. 1 2 "High-resolution photos of Fukushima Daiichi" (Press release). Air Photo Service Co. Ltd., Japan. 24 March 2011. สืบค้นเมื่อ 14 January 2014.
  2. ↑
  3. ↑
  4. ↑ Fukushima disaster: Japan acknowledges first radiation death from nuclear plant hit by tsunami
  5. ↑ "Fukushima nuclear disaster: Japan confirms first worker death from radiation". BBC News. BBC. 5 September 2018. สืบค้นเมื่อ 5 September 2018.
  6. ↑ Hasegawa, A.; Ohira, T.; Maeda, M.; Yasumura, S.; Tanigawa, K. (2016-04-01). "Emergency Responses and Health Consequences after the Fukushima Accident; Evacuation and Relocation". Clinical Oncology (in อังกฤษ). 28cissue=4 (4): 237–244. doi:10.1016/j.clon.2016.01.002. ISSN 0936-6555. PMID 26876459.
  7. ↑ "Radiation-exposed workers to be treated at Chiba hospital". Kyodo News. 17 April 2011. สืบค้นเมื่อ 12 February 2016.
  8. 1 2 3 4 Phillip Lipscy, Kenji Kushida, and Trevor Incerti. 2013. "The Fukushima Disaster and Japan’s Nuclear Plant Vulnerability in Comparative Perspective." Environmental Science and Technology 47 (May), 6082-6088.
  9. ↑ "Explainer: What went wrong in Japan's nuclear reactors". IEEE Spectrum. 4 April 2011.
  10. ↑ "Analysis: A month on, Japan nuclear crisis still scarring" International Business Times (Australia). 9 April 2011, retrieved 12 April 2011; excerpt, According to James Acton, Associate of the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, "Fukushima is not the worst nuclear accident ever but it is the most complicated and the most dramatic...This was a crisis that played out in real time on TV. Chernobyl did not."
  11. 1 2 3 4 Frank N. von Hippel (September/October 2011 vol. 67 no. 5). "The radiological and psychological consequences of the Fukushima Daiichi accident". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. pp. 27–36. Archived from the original on 2011-12-20. Check date values in: |date= (help)
  12. ↑ Black, Richard (15 March 2011). "Reactor breach worsens prospects". BBC Online. สืบค้นเมื่อ 23 March 2011.
  13. 1 2 IAEA press release Japanese Earthquake Update (19 March 2011, 4:30 UTC) 19 March 2011. Archive.org
  14. ↑ W. Maschek, A. Rineiski, M. Flad, V. Kriventsev, F. Gabrielli, K. Morita. "Recriticality, a Key Phenomenon to Investigate in Core Disruptive Accident Scenarios of Current and Future Fast Reactor Designs" (PDF). IAEA & Institute for Nuclear and Energy Technologies (IKET).CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list (link) Note: See picture in the upper left corner of page 2.
  15. 1 2 3 4 24 Hours at Fukushima A blow-by-blow account of the worst nuclear accident since Chernobyl By Eliza Strickland Posted 31 Oct 2011
  16. 1 2 "OECD Timeline for the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident".
  17. ↑ "Fukushima nuclear accident update log, updates of 15 March 2011". IAEA. 15 March 2011. Archived from the original on 2011-04-09. สืบค้นเมื่อ 8 May 2011.
  18. ↑ Hydrogen explosions Fukushima nuclear plant: what happened?
  19. ↑ "MELCOR Model of the Spent Fuel Pool of Fukushima Dai-ichi Unit 4" (PDF). Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
  20. ↑ page 6
  21. ↑ http://eetd-seminars.lbl.gov/sites/eetd-seminars.lbl.gov/files/Fukushima1_Technical_Perspective_LBL_EEDT_04052011-1.pdf What happened at Fukushima a Technical Perspective. Nuclear Regulatory Commission page 11, 26, 29.
  22. 1 2 3 Dennis Normile (27 July 2012). "Is Nuclear Power Good for You?". Science. 337: 395.
  23. 1 2 John E. Ten Hoeve and Mark Z. Jacobson (2012). "Worldwide health effects of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident" (PDF). Energy & Environmental Science. doi:10.1039/c2ee22019a. สืบค้นเมื่อ 18 July 2012.
  24. ↑ WHO report, page 92.
  25. 1 2 3 http://science.time.com/2013/03/01/meltdown-despite-the-fear-the-health-risks-from-the-fukushima-accident-are-minimal/#ixzz2MnbjhPmv Meltdown: Despite the Fear, the Health Risks from the Fukushima Accident Are Minimal Time magazine article which includes a link to the WHO report, and explains the report in laymans terms.
  26. 1 2 WHO 2013, pp. 70, 79-80.
  27. ↑ Ryall, Julian (19 July 2012). "Nearly 36pc of Fukushima children diagnosed with thyroid growths". The Telegraph UK.
  28. 1 2 3 "Radioactivity and thyroid cancer* Christopher Reiners Clinic and Polyclinic of Nuclear Medicine University of Würzburg. See Figure 1. Thyroid cancer Incidence in children and adolescents from Belarus after the Chernobyl accident".
  29. 1 2 3 "Disturbing thyroid cancer rise in Fukushima minors". RT. 21 August 2013.
  30. 1 2 Smith, Alexander (10 September 2013). "Fukushima evacuation has killed more than earthquake and tsunami, survey says". สืบค้นเมื่อ 11 September 2013.
  31. ↑ "Stress-induced deaths in Fukushima top those from 2011 natural disasters".
  32. ↑ National Diet of Japan Fukushima Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation Commission. "国会事故調 | 東京電力福島原子力発電所事故調査委員会のホームページ". National Diet of Japan Fukushima Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation Commission. สืบค้นเมื่อ 9 July 2012.
  33. 1 2 "UPDATE: Government panel blasts lack of 'safety culture' in nuclear accident". The Asahi Shimbun. 23 July 2012. Archived from the original on 2014-04-13. สืบค้นเมื่อ 29 July 2012.
  34. ↑ Fackler, Martin (12 October 2012). "Japan Power Company Admits Failings on Plant Precautions". The New York Times. สืบค้นเมื่อ 13 October 2012. [ลิงก์เสีย]
  35. ↑ Sheldrick, Aaron (12 October 2012). "Fukushima operator must learn from mistakes, new adviser says". Reuters. Archived from the original on 2014-03-09. สืบค้นเมื่อ 13 October 2012.
  36. ↑ Yamaguchi, Mari (12 October 2012). "Japan utility agrees nuclear crisis was avoidable". Boston.com. Associated Press. Archived from the original on 2013-10-05. สืบค้นเมื่อ 13 October 2012.
  37. ↑ "Japanese nuclear plant operator admits playing down risk". CNN Wire Staff. CNN. 12 October 2012. Archived from the original on 2014-03-09. สืบค้นเมื่อ 13 October 2012.
  38. 1 2 Justin Mccurry (10 March 2014). "Fukushima operator may have to dump contaminated water into Pacific". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 2014-03-18. สืบค้นเมื่อ 10 March 2014.
  39. ↑ "Fukushima Daiichi Information Screen". Icjt.org. Archived from the original on 2013-07-12. สืบค้นเมื่อ 15 March 2011.
  40. 1 2 3 Brady, A. Gerald (1980). Ellingwood, Bruce, ed. An Investigation of the Miyagi-ken-oki, Japan, earthquake of June 12, 1978. United States Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards. NBS special publication. 592. p. 123.
  41. 1 2 "The record of the earthquake intensity observed at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station and Fukushima Daini Nuclear Power Station (Interim Report)". TEPCO (Press release). 1 April 2011. Archived from the original on 2014-05-06.
  42. 1 2 "Fukushima faced 14-metre tsunami". World Nuclear News. 24 March 2011. Archived from the original on 2011-06-16. สืบค้นเมื่อ 24 March 2011.
  43. ↑ "Fukushima to Restart Using MOX Fuel for First Time". Nuclear Street. 17 September 2010. Archived from the original on 2014-04-29. สืบค้นเมื่อ 12 March 2011.
  44. ↑ Martin, Alex, "Lowdown on nuclear crisis and potential scenarios", Japan Times, 20 March 2011, p. 3. Archived สิงหาคม 6, 2011 ที่ เวย์แบ็กแมชชีน.
  45. ↑ "Fukushima: Background on Fuel Ponds" (PDF). Archived from the original on 2013-10-16. สืบค้นเมื่อ 23 November 2013.
  46. ↑ "No. 1 fuel pool power to be restored: Tepco". Archived from the original on 2014-01-07. สืบค้นเมื่อ 20 March 2013.
  47. ↑ "NISA – The 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Pacific Earthquake and the seismic damage to the NPPs, pg 35" (PDF). สืบค้นเมื่อ 24 April 2011. [ลิงก์เสีย]
  48. 1 2 Grier, Peter (16 March 2011). "Meltdown 101: Why is Fukushima crisis still out of control?". Christian Science Monitor. Archived from the original on 2014-05-06. สืบค้นเมื่อ 27 March 2011.
  49. ↑ Helman, Christopher (15 March 2011). "Explainer: What caused the incident at Fukushima-Daiichi". Forbes. Archived from the original on 2011-03-16. สืบค้นเมื่อ 7 April 2011.
  50. ↑ DOE fundamentals handbook – Decay heat, Nuclear physics and reactor theory ที่ เวย์แบ็กแมชชีน (archived มีนาคม 16, 2011)., Vol. 2, module 4, p. 61.
  51. ↑ "What if it happened here?". Somdnews.com. Archived from the original on 2011-04-27. สืบค้นเมื่อ 7 April 2011.
  52. ↑ "More on spent fuel pools at Fukushima". Allthingsnuclear.org. 21 March 2011. Archived from the original on 2011-04-09. สืบค้นเมื่อ 7 April 2011.
  53. ↑ Higgins, Andrew, "disorder intensified Japan's crisis", The Washington Post, 19 April 2011, Retrieved 21 April 2011. [ลิงก์เสีย]
  54. ↑ Pre-construction safety report – Sub-chapter 9.2 – Water Systems. AREVA NP / EDF, published 2009-06-29, Retrieved 23 March 2011.
  55. ↑ Mike Soraghan (24 March 2011). "Japan disaster raises questions about backup power at US nuclear plants". The New York Times. Greenwire. สืบค้นเมื่อ 7 April 2011.
  56. ↑ "Regulatory effectiveness of the station blackout rule" (PDF). สืบค้นเมื่อ 7 April 2011.
  57. ↑ "Why has it become impossible for Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Station to cool reactor core?". Shimbun.denki.or.jp. Archived from the original on 2011-04-27. สืบค้นเมื่อ 7 April 2011.
  58. ↑ https://www.nfb.ca/film/meltdown_doc>
  59. 1 2 "The 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Pacific Earthquake and the seismic damage to the NPPs" (PDF). สืบค้นเมื่อ 13 July 2011. [ลิงก์เสีย]
  60. 1 2 Shirouzu, Norihiko (1 July 2011). "Wall Street Journal: Design Flaw Fueled Nuclear Disaster". Online.wsj.com. Archived from the original on 2011-07-01. สืบค้นเมื่อ 13 July 2011.
  61. ↑ Yoshida, Reiji, "GE plan followed with inflexibility", Japan Times, 14 July 2011, p. 1. ถูกบันทึกไว้ 13 กรกฎาคม 2554 ที่ WebCite
  62. ↑ Arita, Eriko, "Disaster analysis you may not hear elsewhere", Japan Times, 20 March 2011, p. 12. Archived สิงหาคม 29, 2011 ที่ เวย์แบ็กแมชชีน.
  63. ↑ Agence France-Presse/Jiji Press, "Tsunami that knocked out nuke plant cooling systems topped 14 meters", Japan Times, 23 March 2011, p. 2.
  64. ↑ "IAEA warned Japan over nuclear quake risk: WikiLeaks". physorg.com. Archived from the original on 2012-01-17. สืบค้นเมื่อ 26 March 2011.
  65. ↑ "Plant Status of Fukushima Daini Nuclear Power Station (as of 0 AM 12 March )", TEPCO, end of day 11 April. Archived กุมภาพันธ์ 15, 2014 ที่ เวย์แบ็กแมชชีน.
  66. ↑ Fukushima No. 1 plant designed on 'trial-and-error' basis, Asahi Shimbun, 7 April 2011. ถูกบันทึกไว้ 13 เมษายน 2554 ที่ WebCite
  67. 1 2 "IAEA Update on Japan Earthquake". Archived from the original on 2011-03-12. สืบค้นเมื่อ 16 March 2011. As reported earlier, a 400 millisieverts (mSv) per hour radiation dose observed at Fukushima Daiichi occurred between 1s 3 and 4. This is a high dose-level value, but it is a local value at a single location and at a certain point in time. The IAEA continues to confirm the evolution and value of this dose rate. It should be noted that because of this detected value, non-indispensable staff was evacuated from the plant, in line with the Emergency Response Plan, and that the population around the plant is already evacuated.
  68. ↑ "Spraying continues at Fukushima Daiichi". 18 March 2011. Archived from the original on 2011-03-18. สืบค้นเมื่อ 19 March 2011.
  69. ↑ "The Japanese Nuclear Emergency – Sydney Technical Presentation". Engineers Australia. 6 June 2011. Archived from the original on 2011-09-30. สืบค้นเมื่อ 22 August 2011.
  70. ↑ B. Cox, JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS, PELLET CLAD INTERACTION (PCI) FAILURES OF ZIRCONIUM ALLOY FUEL CLADDING – A REVIEW, 1990, volume 172, pages 249–292
  71. ↑ The Mainichi Shimbun (28 28 February 2012)TEPCO ordered to report on change in piping layout at Fukushima plant [ลิงก์เสีย]
  72. ↑ Norihiko Shirouzu and Rebecca Smith (16 March 2011). "Plant's design, safety record are under scrutiny". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 2013-05-26.
  73. ↑ "Environment: The San Jose Three". TIME Magazine. 16 February 1976. สืบค้นเมื่อ 3 March 2012
  74. ↑ "Environment: The Struggle over Nuclear Power". TIME Magazine. 8 March 1976. Archived from the original on 2013-08-14. สืบค้นเมื่อ 3 March 2012.
  75. ↑ ABC News. "Fukushima: Mark 1 Nuclear Reactor Design Caused GE Scientist To Quit In Protest". Archived from the original on 2011-03-16. สืบค้นเมื่อ 15 March 2011.
  76. ↑ "Special report-fuel storage, safety issues vexed Japan plant". Reuters. 22 March 2011. Archived from the original on 2013-12-20.
  77. ↑ "Operator of Fukushima nuke plant admitted to faking repair records". Herald Sun. Australia. 20 March 2011. Archived from the original on 2012-04-16. สืบค้นเมื่อ 24 April 2011.
  78. ↑ NHK-world (29 December 2011) Fukushima plant's backup generator failed in 1991.
    JAIF (30 December 2011)Eathquake report 304:Fukushima plant's backup generator failed in 1991.
    The Mainichi Daily News (30 December 2011) TEPCO neglected anti-flood measures at Fukushima plant despite knowing risk. [ลิงก์เสีย]
  79. ↑ "TEPCO did not act on tsunami risk projected for nuclear plant |". Jagadees.wordpress.com. 2012-02-13. Archived from the original on 2014-04-12. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2013-12-30.
  80. ↑ "AFERC urged to review assumption on Tsunami in 2009". Yomiuri News Paper. 11 March 2011. Archived from the original on 2014-02-16. สืบค้นเมื่อ 14 September 2013.
  81. ↑ "Fukushima Nuclear Accident - U.S. NRC warned a risk on emergency power 20 years ago". Bloomberg L.P. 16 March 2011. Archived from the original on 2014-02-16. สืบค้นเมื่อ 14 September 2013.
  82. ↑ "IAEA warned Japan over nuclear quake risk: WikiLeaks". physorg.com. Daily Telegraph. 17 March 2011. Archived from the original on 2012-01-17.
  83. ↑ "Magnitude 9.0 – near the East coast of Honshu, Japan". Earthquake.usgs.gov. Archived from the original on 2011-03-12. สืบค้นเมื่อ 17 March 2011.
  84. ↑ "Plant Status of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station (as of 0AM March 12th )". TEPCO (Press release). 12 March 2011. Archived from the original on 2011-05-10. สืบค้นเมื่อ 13 March 2011.
  85. 1 2 "Occurrence of a specific incident stipulated in Article 10, Clause 1 of the Act on "Special measures concerning nuclear emergency preparedness (Fukushima Daiichi)"". TEPCO (Press release). 11 March 2011. Archived from the original on 2011-04-03. สืบค้นเมื่อ 13 March 2011.
  86. ↑ Associated Press, "How the first 24 hours shaped Fukushima nuclear crisis", Japan Times, 7 July 2011, p. 3. ถูกบันทึกไว้ 7 กรกฎาคม 2554 ที่ WebCite
  87. 1 2 3 "TEPCO press release 3". Tepco (Press release). 11 March 2011. Archived from the original on 2011-04-25.
  88. 1 2 TEPCO tardy on N-plant emergency: National: Daily Yomiuri Online (The Daily Yomiuri). Yomiuri.co.jp (12 April 2011). Retrieved 30 April 2011. ถูกบันทึกไว้ 13 เมษายน 2554 ที่ WebCite
  89. ↑ Eric Talmadge (1 July 2011). "AP: First 24 hours shaped Japan nuke crisis". Google.com. สืบค้นเมื่อ 13 July 2011.
  90. ↑ Japan Meteorological Agency|Tsunami Warnings/Advisories, Tsunami Information. Jma.go.jp. Retrieved 30 April 2011. ถูกบันทึกไว้ 18 เมษายน 2554 ที่ WebCite
  91. ↑ Bloomberg, "Tepco revises tsunami's height to 15 meters", 10 April 2011, Archived ธันวาคม 29, 2013 ที่ เวย์แบ็กแมชชีน.
  92. 1 2 David Sanger and Matthew Wald, Radioactive releases in Japan could last months, experts say. The New York Times 13 March 2011 [ลิงก์เสีย]
  93. ↑ "Massive earthquake hits Japan". World Nuclear News. 11 March 2011. Archived from the original on 2011-04-11. สืบค้นเมื่อ 13 March 2011.; "Japan earthquake update (2030 CET)". International Atomic Energy Agency. 11 March 2011. Archived from the original on 2011-04-11. สืบค้นเมื่อ 12 March 2011.
  94. ↑ Bloomberg L.P., "Time not on workers' side as crisis raced on", Japan Times, 5 May 2011, p. 3. ถูกบันทึกไว้ 6 พฤษภาคม 2554 ที่ WebCite
  95. ↑ Inajima, Tsuyoshi; Okada, Yuji (11 March 2011). "Japan Orders Evacuation From Near Nuclear Plant After Quake". Bloomberg BusinessWeek. Archived from the original on 2012-02-02. สืบค้นเมื่อ 11 March 2011.
  96. ↑ "Japan Earthquake Update (2210 CET)". International Atomic Energy Agency (Press release). 11 March 2011. Archived from the original on 2011-03-13. สืบค้นเมื่อ 12 March 2011.
  97. ↑ Magnier, Mark; และคณะ (16 March 2011). "New power line could restore cooling systems at Fukushima Daiichi plant". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on 2011-03-17. สืบค้นเมื่อ 19 March 2011.
  98. ↑ "Stabilisation at Fukushima Daiichi". World-nuclear-news.org. 20 March 2011. Archived from the original on 2011-04-11. สืบค้นเมื่อ 24 April 2011.
  99. ↑ Richard Black (15 March 2011). "Japan quake: Radiation rises at Fukushima nuclear plant". BBC Online. Archived from the original on 2011-03-15. สืบค้นเมื่อ 15 March 2011.
  100. ↑ "Japan's PM urges people to clear 20-km zone around Fukushima NPP (Update-1)". RIA Novosti. Archived from the original on 2013-05-11. สืบค้นเมื่อ 15 March 2011.
  101. ↑ Makinen, Julie (25 March 2011). "Japan steps up nuclear plant precautions; Kan apologizes". Los Angeles Times.
  102. ↑ Herman, Steve (12 April 2011). "VOA Correspondent Reaches Crippled Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant". VOA. Archived from the original on 2013-06-01. สืบค้นเมื่อ 5 March 2014.
  103. ↑ Takahashi, Hideki, and Shinya Kokubun, "Workers grappled with darkness at start of Fukushima nuclear crisis", Japan Times, 3 September 2014, p. 3
  104. ↑ Takahashi, Hideki, Shinya Kokubun, and Yukiko Maeda, "Response stymied by loss of electricity", Japan Times, 3 September 2014, p. 3
  105. ↑ Takahashi, Hideki, and Hisashi Ota, "Fukushima workers tried to save reactor 1 through venting", Japan Times, 3 September 2014, p. 3
  106. 1 2 Uncertainties abound in Fukushima decommissioning. Phys.org. 19 Nov 2013. Archived มีนาคม 14, 2014 ที่ เวย์แบ็กแมชชีน.
  107. 1 2 Most of fuel NOT remaining in reactor1 core / Tepco "but molten fuel is stopped in the concrete base" Fukushima-Diary.com Archived มีนาคม 25, 2014 ที่ เวย์แบ็กแมชชีน.
  108. 1 2 "Reactor 3 fuel is assumed to have melted concrete base up to 26cm to the wall of primary vessel". Fukushima Diary. สืบค้นเมื่อ 12 June 2015.
  109. 1 2 "TEPCO Admits Unit 3 Had Total Melt Through". SimplyInfo. สืบค้นเมื่อ 12 June 2015.
  110. 1 2 "Fukushima Unit 3 Reactor Vessel Failure Preceded Explosion". SimplyInfo. สืบค้นเมื่อ 12 June 2015.
  111. ↑ Fukushima Timeline scientificamerican.com Archived มีนาคม 6, 2014 ที่ เวย์แบ็กแมชชีน.
  112. ↑ The Evaluation Status of Reactor Core Damage at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Units 1 to 3 30 November 2011 Tokyo Electric Power Company
  113. ↑ Report on the Investigation and Study of Unconfirmed/Unclear Matters in the Fukushima Nuclear Accident – Progress Report No.2 – 6 August 2014 Tokyo Electric Power Company, Inc.
  114. ↑ TEPCO to start "scanning" inside of Reactor 1 in early February by using muon - Fukushima Diary
  115. ↑ Muon Scans Begin At Fukushima Daiichi - SimplyInfo
  116. ↑ Muon Scan Finds No Fuel In Fukushima Unit 1 Reactor Vessel - SimplyInfo
  117. ↑ IRID saw no fuel or water remaining in reactor core of Reactor 1 - Fukushima Diary
  118. ↑ "Most fuel in Fukushima 4 pool undamaged". world nucler news. 14 April 2011. Archived from the original on 2011-04-15. สืบค้นเมื่อ 27 January 2012.
  119. ↑ "Japan Diplomat: Ground underneath Fukushima Unit 4 is sinking — More than 30 inches in some areas — Now in danger of collapse". ENENews. Archived from the original on 2014-03-26. สืบค้นเมื่อ 24 October 2012. Due to its ground has been sinking, reactor 4 is now endangered in collapse. … According to secretary of former Prime Minister Kan, the ground level of the building has been sinking 80 cm … unevenly. Because the ground itself has the problem, whether the building can resist a quake bigger than M6 still remains a question.
  120. ↑ "Gundersen: Japan ambassador confirms Fukushima Unit 4 is sinking unevenly — Building "may begin to be tilting"". ENENews. Archived from the original on 2014-03-11. สืบค้นเมื่อ 24 October 2012. So I have been able to confirm that there is unequal sinking at Unit 4, not just the fact the site sunk by 36 inches immediately after the accident, but also that Unit 4 continues to sink something on the order of 0.8 meters, or around 30 inches.
  121. ↑ "FUEL REMOVAL FROM UNIT 4 REACTOR BUILDING COMPLETED AT FUKUSHIMA DAIICHI". TEPCO. 22 December 2014. สืบค้นเมื่อ 24 December 2014.
  122. ↑ "Seismic Damage Information (the 61st Release)". Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency. 29 March 2011. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-04-11. สืบค้นเมื่อ 12 April 2011.
  123. ↑ Cresswell, Adam (16 March 2011). "Stealthy, silent destroyer of DNA". The Australian
  124. ↑ Fukushima radioactive fallout nears Chernobyl levels – 24 March 2011. New Scientist. Retrieved 30 April 2011. ถูกบันทึกไว้ 25 มีนาคม 2554 ที่ WebCite
  125. ↑ Report: Emissions from Japan plant approach Chernobyl levels, USA Today, 24 March 2011 Archived สิงหาคม 18, 2013 ที่ เวย์แบ็กแมชชีน.
  126. ↑ Doughton, Sandi. (5 April 2011) Local News|Universities come through in monitoring for radiation|Seattle Times Newspaper. Seattletimes.nwsource.com. Retrieved 30 April 2011. Archived กันยายน 21, 2011 ที่ เวย์แบ็กแมชชีน.
  127. ↑ IRSN (26 October 2011). "Synthèse actualisée des connaissances relatives à l'impact sur le milieu marin des rejets radioactifs du site nucléaire accidenté de Fukushima Dai-ichi" (PDF). สืบค้นเมื่อ 3 January 2012.
  128. ↑ Buesseler, Ken O.; Jayne, Steven R.; Fisher, Nicholas S.; Rypina, Irina I.; Baumann, Hannes; Baumann, Zofia; Breier, Crystaline F.; Douglass, Elizabeth M.; George, Jennifer; MacDonald, Alison M.; Miyamoto, Hiroomi; Nishikawa, Jun; Pike, Steven M.; Yoshida, Sashiko (2012). "Fukushima-derived radionuclides in the ocean and biota off Japan". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 109 (16): 5984–8. doi:10.1073/pnas.1120794109. PMC 3341070. PMID 22474387.
  129. ↑ "CTBTO to Share Data with IAEA and WHO". CTBTO Press Release 18 March 2011. Archived from the original on 2013-12-24. สืบค้นเมื่อ 17 May 2012.
  130. ↑ "Fukushima-Related Measurements by the CTBTO". CTBTO Press Release 13 April 2011. Archived from the original on 2011-05-06. สืบค้นเมื่อ 17 May 2012.
  131. ↑ "CTBTO Trakcs Fukushima's Radioactive Release". Animation CTBTO YouTube Channel. Archived from the original on 2012-05-23. สืบค้นเมื่อ 17 May 2012.
  132. 1 2 No-Man's Land Attests to Japan's Nuclear Nightmare. ABC News, 27. December 2011. Archived ธันวาคม 28, 2011 ที่ เวย์แบ็กแมชชีน.
  133. ↑ "Reactor accident Fukushima – New international study". Norwegian Institute for Air Research. 21 October 2011. Archived from the original on 2014-01-06. สืบค้นเมื่อ 20 January 2012.
  134. ↑ David Guttenfelder (27 December 2011). "No-man's land attests to Japan's nuclear nightmare". theStar.com. Toronto. Archived from the original on 2012-01-10. สืบค้นเมื่อ 20 January 2012.
  135. ↑ Kyodo News, "Radioactivity Dispersal Distance From Fukushima 1/10th Of Chernobyl's", 13 March 2012, (wire service report), "The data showed, for example, more than 1.48 million becquerels (40 microcuries) of radioactive caesium per square meter was detected in soil at a location some 250 kilometers away from the Chernobyl plant. In the case of the Fukushima Daiichi plant, the distance was much smaller at about 33 km, the officials said."
  136. ↑ Hongo, Jun, "Fukushima soil fallout far short of Chernobyl", Japan Times, 15 March 2012, p. 1. [ลิงก์เสีย]
  137. ↑ Michael Winter (24 March 2011). "Report: Emissions from Japan plant approach Chernobyl levels". USA Today. Archived from the original on 2013-08-18.
  138. ↑ Hamada, Nobuyuki. "Safety regulations of food and water implemented in the first year following the Fukushima nuclear accident". Oxford Journals. สืบค้นเมื่อ 30 November 2013.
  139. 1 2 "福島産の新米、東京で販売開始　全袋検査に合格". 共同 Nikkei Kyodo news. 2012-09-01. Archived from the original on 2013-12-03. สืบค้นเมื่อ 18 April 2013.
  140. ↑ JAIF (5 September 2011) NSC Recalculates Total Amount of Radioactive Materials Released
  141. ↑ INES (the International Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale) Rating on the Events in Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Station by the Tohoku District – off the Pacific Ocean Earthquake. NISA/METI, 12 April 2011, archived from Original.
  142. ↑ JAIF (9 September 2011) Radioactive release into sea estimated triple
  143. ↑ JAIF 20 September 2011 Earthquake-report 211: A new plan set to reduce radiation emissions
  144. ↑ Possibility of recriticality again, Fukushima Diary Archived ธันวาคม 24, 2013 ที่ เวย์แบ็กแมชชีน.
  145. ↑ Increasing leakage of Iodine-131, Fukushima Diary Archived ธันวาคม 24, 2013 ที่ เวย์แบ็กแมชชีน.
  146. ↑ IRSN (26 October 2011). "Synthèse actualisée des connaissances relatives à l'impact sur le milieu marin des rejets radioactifs du site nucléaire accidenté de Fukushima Dai-ichi" (PDF). สืบค้นเมื่อ 3 January 2012
  147. ↑ Daniel J. Madigan, Zofia Baumann, and Nicholas S. Fisher (29 May 2012). "Pacific bluefin tuna transport Fukushima-derived radionuclides from Japan to California". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 109 (24): 9483–9486. doi:10.1073/pnas.1204859109. PMC 3386103. PMID 22645346CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list (link)
  148. ↑ Aoki, Mizuho, "Tohoku fears nuke crisis evacuees gone for good", Japan Times, 8 March 2012, p. 1. Archived มีนาคม 7, 2012 ที่ เวย์แบ็กแมชชีน.
  149. ↑ TEPCO Press Release. "The Estimated Amount of Radioactive Materials Released into the Air and the Ocean Caused by Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Accident Due to the Tohoku-Chihou-Taiheiyou-Oki Earthquake (As of May 2012)". TEPCO. Archived from the original on 2014-02-15. สืบค้นเมื่อ 24 May 2012.
  150. ↑ Kevin Krolicki (24 May 2012). "Fukushima radiation higher than first estimated". Reuters. Archived from the original on 2013-10-15. สืบค้นเมื่อ 24 May 2012.
  151. ↑ "TEPCO puts radiation release early in Fukushima crisis at 900 PBq". Kyodo News. 24 May 2012. Archived from the original on 2012-05-24. สืบค้นเมื่อ 24 May 2012.
  152. ↑ Estimation of radionuclide emission during the 15 March 2011 accident at the fukushima-1 npp (japan)", R. V. Arutyunyan, L. A. Bolshov, D. A. Pripachkin, V. N. Semyonov, O. S. Sorokovikova, A. L. Fokin, K. G. Rubinstein, R. Yu. Ignatov, M. M. Smirnova, Atomnaya Énergiya, Vol. 112, No. 3, pp. 159–163, March, 2012, as reported in Atomic Energy, July 2012, Volume 112, Issue 3, pp 188-193s
  153. ↑ Boytchev, Hristio, "First study reports very low internal radioactivity after Fukushima disaster", Washington Post, 15 August 2012
  154. ↑ Ken O. Buesseler (26 October 2012). "Fishing for Answers off Fukushima". Science. 338 (6106): 480–482. doi:10.1126/science.1228250. PMID 23112321. Archived from the original on 2013-08-17.
  155. ↑ Tabuchi, Hiroko (25 October 2012). "Fish Off Japan's Coast Said to Contain Elevated Levels of Cesium". New York Times Asia Pacific. สืบค้นเมื่อ 28 October 2012.
  156. ↑ Nu.nl (26 oktober 2012) Tepco sluit niet uit dat centrale Fukushima nog lekt Archived มกราคม 8, 2014 ที่ เวย์แบ็กแมชชีน. (ดัตช์)
  157. ↑ Fukushima Plant Admits Radioactive Water Leaked To Sea. Huffingtonpost.com. Retrieved on 2013-09-06. Archived เมษายน 17, 2014 ที่ เวย์แบ็กแมชชีน.
  158. ↑ Adelman, Jacob. (2013-08-07) Abe Pledges Government Help to Stem Fukushima Water Leaks. Bloomberg. Retrieved on 2013-09-06. Archived ธันวาคม 2, 2013 ที่ เวย์แบ็กแมชชีน.
  159. ↑ "Wrecked Fukushima storage tank leaking highly radioactive water". Reuters. 20 August 2013. Archived from the original on 2014-04-29. สืบค้นเมื่อ 21 August 2013.
  160. ↑ Volume of a Swimming Pool The Physics Factbook™ Edited by Glenn Elert -- Written by his students An educational, Fair Use website."2,500,000 liters" Archived เกิดข้อผิดพลาด: ค่าเวลาไม่ถูกต้อง ที่ เวย์แบ็กแมชชีน.
  161. ↑ Given that an Olympic swimming pool is 50 by 25 by 2 meters. It therefore contains 2,500 cubic meters of water. Each cubic meter of water is one metric ton. Archived ธันวาคม 2, 2013 ที่ เวย์แบ็กแมชชีน.
  162. ↑ "Japan nuclear agency upgrades Fukushima alert level". BBC. 21 August 2013. Archived from the original on 2014-04-29. สืบค้นเมื่อ 21 August 2013.
  163. ↑ Takashi Hirokawa, Jacob Adelman, Peter Langan and Yuji Okada (26 August 2013). "Fukushima Leaks Prompt Government to 'Emergency Measures' (1)". Businessweek. Bloomberg. Archived from the original on 2013-09-30. สืบค้นเมื่อ 27 August 2013.CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list (link)
  164. ↑ "Japan seeks outside help for contaminated water". World Nuclear News. 26 September 2013. Archived from the original on 2014-04-02. สืบค้นเมื่อ 1 October 2013.
  165. ↑ "How TEPCO plans to build an ice wall at Fukushima". Nuclear Engineering International. 18 February 2014. Archived from the original on 2014-02-24. สืบค้นเมื่อ 19 February 2014.
  166. ↑ date=9 February 2014. "TEPCO to review erroneous radiation data". NKH World. NHK. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2014-02-09. Tokyo Electric Power Company, or TEPCO, says it has detected a record high 5 million becquerels (0.13 millicuries)per liter of radioactive strontium in groundwater collected last July from one of the wells close to the ocean. ... Based on the result, levels of radioactive substances that emit beta particles are estimated to be 10 million becquerels (0.26 millicuries) per liter, which is more than 10 times the initial reading.CS1 maint: Missing pipe (link) [ลิงก์เสีย]
  167. ↑ date=9 February 2014. "TEPCO to Review Erroneous Radiation Data". Yomiuri Online. Yomiuri Shimbun. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2014-02-09. On February 6, TEPCO announced that 5 million Bq/Liter of radioactive strontium was detected from the groundwater sample taken on June 5 last year from one of the observation wells on the embankment of Fukushima I Nuclear Power Plant. The density is 160,000 times that of the legal limit for release into the ocean, and it is about 1,000 times that of the highest density in the groundwater that had been measured so far (5,100 Bq/L). TEPCO didn't disclose the result of measurement of strontium alone, as the company believed there was a possibility that the result of measurement was wrong. As to this particular sample, TEPCO had announced on July last year that the sample had contained 900,000 Bq/L of all-beta including strontium. On February 6, TEPCO explained that they had "underestimated all of the results of high-density all-beta, which exceeded the upper limit of measurement." This particular sample may contain about 10 million Bq/L of all-beta, according to TEPCO. The company recently switched to a different method of analysis that uses diluted samples when the density of radioactive materials is high.CS1 maint: Missing pipe (link)
  168. ↑ Fernquest, John. "Japan floods: After typhoon, rivers overflow, nuclear water". สืบค้นเมื่อ 2015-09-10.
  169. ↑ "Flooding swept away radiation cleanup bags in Fukushima". The Japan Times Online (in อังกฤษ). 2015-09-12. ISSN 0447-5763. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2015-09-13.
  170. ↑ Fukushima's radioactive ocean plume due to reach US waters in 2014 - NBC News Archived มีนาคม 26, 2014 ที่ เวย์แบ็กแมชชีน.
  171. ↑ Sherwood, Courtney (11 November 2014). "Fukushima radiation nears California coast, judged harmless". Science.
  172. 1 2 Yoichi Funabashi and Kay Kitazawa (1 March 2012). "Fukushima in review: A complex disaster, a disastrous response". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists.
  173. ↑ Hiroko Tabuchi (3 March 2012). "Japanese Prime Minister Says Government Shares Blame for Nuclear Disaster". The New York Times.
  174. 1 2 "AP Interview: Japan woefully unprepared for nuclear disaster, ex-prime minister says". ctv.ca. 17 February 2012.
  175. 1 2 Amory Lovins (2011). "Soft Energy Paths for the 21st Century". Archived from the original on 2013-12-24.
  176. ↑ "Japan did not keep records of nuclear disaster meetings". BBC Online. 27 January 2012. Archived from the original on 2014-02-20.
  177. ↑ "Fukushima Pref. deleted 5 days of radiation dispersion data just after meltdowns". The Mainichi Shimbun. 22 March 2012. Archived from the original on 2012-03-25.
  178. 1 2 "Report: Japan, utility at fault for response to nuclear disaster". LA Times. 26 December 2011. Archived from the original on 2014-01-23.
  179. ↑ Martin Fackler (27 February 2012). "Japan Weighed Evacuating Tokyo in Nuclear Crisis". The New York Times. [ลิงก์เสีย]
  180. ↑ Yoshida, Reiji (17 March 2012). "Kan hero, or irate meddler?". Japan Times. p. 2. Archived from the original on 2012-11-01.
  181. ↑ "Blow-ups happen: Nuclear plants can be kept safe only by constantly worrying about their dangers". The Economist. 10 March 2012. Archived from the original on 2014-04-12.
  182. ↑ Kyodo News (20 June 2012). "Japan sat on U.S. radiation maps showing immediate fallout from nuke crisis". Japan Times. p. 1. Archived from the original on 2012-11-01.
  183. ↑ "Japan failed to use U.S. radiation data gathered after nuke crisis". The Mainichi Shimbun. 18 June 2012. [ลิงก์เสีย]
  184. ↑ Japan Atomic Industrial Forum, Inc. (JAIF) (19 June 2012). "Earthquake report 447" (PDF)[ลิงก์เสีย]
  185. ↑ "NISA News Release April 12, 2011". Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-07-23. สืบค้นเมื่อ 24 April 2011.
  186. 1 2 Directly comparing Fukushima to Chernobyl : Nature News Blog. Blogs.nature.com (2013-01-31). Retrieved on 2013-02-13. Archived ตุลาคม 28, 2013 ที่ เวย์แบ็กแมชชีน.
  187. ↑ Austria (12 April 2011). "IAEA Fukushima Nuclear Accident Update Log – Updates of 12 April 2011". Iaea.org. Archived from the original on 2011-04-15. สืบค้นเมื่อ 24 April 2011.
  188. 1 2 Press Release | The Estimated Amount of Radioactive Materials Released into the Air and the Ocean Caused by Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Accident Due to the Tohoku-Chihou-Taiheiyou-Oki Earthquake (As of May 2012). TEPCO. Retrieved on 2013-02-13. Archived กุมภาพันธ์ 15, 2014 ที่ เวย์แบ็กแมชชีน.
  189. 1 2 3 Chapter II The release, dispersion and deposition of radionuclides - Chernobyl: Assessment of Radiological and Health Impact. Oecd-nea.org. Retrieved on 2013-02-13. ถูกบันทึกไว้ 20 เมษายน 2554 ที่ WebCite
  190. ↑ Cesium-137: A Deadly Hazard. Large.stanford.edu (2012-03-20). Retrieved on 2013-02-13. Archived ตุลาคม 30, 2013 ที่ เวย์แบ็กแมชชีน.
  191. ↑ Isotopic ratio of radioactive iodine (129I/131I) released from Fukushima Daiichi NPP accident
  192. ↑ Japan Earthquake - Tsunami Fast Facts, CNN, 2014-02-20, สืบค้นเมื่อ 2014-04-06 Archived ตุลาคม 31, 2013 ที่ เวย์แบ็กแมชชีน.
  193. ↑ Brumfiel, Geoffrey (23 May 2012). "World Health Organization weighs in on Fukushima". Nature (journal). Archived from the original on 2013-10-06. สืบค้นเมื่อ 20 March 2013.
  194. ↑ Brumfiel, Geoff (Jan 2013). "Fukushima: Fallout of fear". Nature. 493 (7432): 290–293. doi:10.1038/493290a. PMID 23325191.
  195. ↑ Brumfiel, Geoff (May 2012). "PRINT - FUKUSHIMA". Nature. 485 (7399): 423–424. doi:10.1038/485423a. PMID 22622542.
  196. ↑ Nebehay, Stephanie (28 February 2013). "Higher cancer risk after Fukushima nuclear disaster: WHO". Reuters. Archived from the original on 2013-10-15.
  197. ↑ Rojavin, Y; Seamon, MJ; Tripathi, RS; Papadimos, TJ; Galwankar, S; Kman, N; Cipolla, J; Grossman, MD; Marchigiani, R; Stawicki, SP (Apr 2011). "Civilian nuclear incidents: An overview of historical, medical, and scientific aspects". J Emerg Trauma Shock. 4 (2): 260–72. doi:10.4103/0974-2700.82219.
  198. ↑ WHO 2013, p. 42.
  199. ↑ WHO 2013, p. 92.
  200. 1 2 "Global report on Fukushima nuclear accident details health risks". Archived from the original on 2014-04-12. สืบค้นเมื่อ 28 April 2014.
  201. ↑ Frequently asked questions on the Fukushima health risk assessment, questions 3 & 4 Archived กุมภาพันธ์ 13, 2014 ที่ เวย์แบ็กแมชชีน.
  202. ↑ WHO 2013, p. 83.
  203. ↑ "WHO: Slight cancer risk after Japan nuke accident". Archived from the original on 2013-03-03.
  204. ↑ "WHO report: cancer risk from Fukushima is low". Nuclear Engineering International. 1 March 2013. Archived from the original on 2013-10-14. สืบค้นเมื่อ 6 March 2013.
  205. 1 2 3 Walsh, Bryan. (2013-03-01) WHO Report Says That Fukushima Nuclear Accident Posed Minimal Risk to Health | TIME.com. Science.time.com. Retrieved on 2013-09-06. Archived พฤศจิกายน 4, 2013 ที่ เวย์แบ็กแมชชีน.
  206. ↑ WHO 2013, p. 13.
  207. ↑ "Thyroid cancer statistics". สืบค้นเมื่อ 12 June 2015.
  208. ↑ Normile, D. (2011). "Fukushima Revives the Low-Dose Debate". Science. 332 (6032): 908–910. doi:10.1126/science.332.6032.908. PMID 21596968.
  209. ↑ "Radioactive Tuna Fish From Fukushima Reactor Spotted Off U.S. Shores". Fox Weekly. 2014-04-30. Archived from the original on 2014-05-02.
  210. ↑ Sebens, Shelby (2014-04-29). "Study finds Fukushima radioactivity in tuna off Oregon, Washington". Yahoo. Archived from the original on 2014-05-03.
  211. ↑ Worstall, Tim (2013-11-16). "Fukushima Radiation In Pacific Tuna Is Equal To One Twentieth Of A Banana". Forbes. Archived from the original on 2014-05-02.
  212. ↑ WHO 2013, p. 87-88.
  213. ↑ Welch, H. Gilbert; Woloshin, Steve; Schwartz, Lisa A. (2011). Overdiagnosed: Making People Sick in the Pursuit of Health. Beacon Press. pp. 61–34. ISBN 978-0-8070-2200-9.
  214. ↑ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19601965
  215. ↑ "Fukushima kids have skyrocketing number of thyroid abnormalities - report". Russia Times. 18 February 2013. Archived from the original on 2014-04-15.
  216. ↑ http://www.fmu.ac.jp/radiationhealth/workshop201402/presentation/Co-Chairs_Summary_E.pdf
  217. ↑ cancer.org Thyroid Cancer By the American Cancer Society. In turn citing: AJCC Cancer Staging Manual (7th ed). Archived ตุลาคม 18, 2013 ที่ เวย์แบ็กแมชชีน.
  218. ↑ Brumfiel, Geoff (10 September 2012). "Fukushima's doses tallied". Archived from the original on 2014-02-14. สืบค้นเมื่อ 23 May 2013.
  219. ↑ Zablotska, Lydia (8 November 2012). "Chernobyl Cleanup Workers Had Significantly Increased Risk of Leukemia". UCSF. Archived from the original on 2014-01-04.
  220. ↑ "Chernobyl: the true scale of the accident. 20 Years Later a UN Report Provides Definitive Answers and Ways to Repair Lives". Archived from the original on 2007-10-03.
  221. 1 2 Studying the Fukushima Aftermath: 'People Are Suffering from Radiophobia' - SPIEGEL ONLINE. Spiegel.de (2011-08-19). Retrieved on 2013-09-06. Archived มกราคม 16, 2014 ที่ เวย์แบ็กแมชชีน.
  222. 1 2 "Evacuees of Fukushima village report split families, growing frustration" (PDF). Mainichi Daily News. 30 January 2012.
  223. ↑ Katherine Harmon (2 March 2012). "Japan's Post-Fukushima Earthquake Health Woes Go Beyond Radiation Effects". Nature. Archived from the original on 2013-10-13.
  224. ↑ "Stress-induced deaths in Fukushima top those from 2011 natural disasters". Archived from the original on 2013-09-27.
  225. ↑ "Rain raises fear of more contamination at Fukushima". CNN. 4 Jun 2011. Archived from the original on 2013-12-24.
  226. ↑ "about the situation at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant". 3 Feb 2014. Archived from the original on 2014-02-22.
  227. ↑ "estimates claims burden from earthquake in Japan at around €1.5bn". Munich Re. 22 March 2011. Archived from the original on 2011-05-15. สืบค้นเมื่อ 24 April 2011.
  228. ↑ Swiss Re provides estimate of its claims costs from Japan earthquake and tsunami, Swiss Re, news release, 21 March 2011
  229. ↑ Tsuyoshi Inajima and Yuji Okada (28 Oct 2011). "Nuclear Promotion Dropped in Japan Energy Policy After Fukushima". Bloomberg. Archived from the original on 2013-12-28.
  230. ↑ Mari Yamaguchi (September 2011). "Kenzaburo Oe, Nobel Winner Urges Japan To Abandon Nuclear Power". Huffington Post. Archived from the original on 2013-12-20.
  231. ↑ Japanese nuclear plant survived tsunami, offers clues. Reuters. Retrieved on 2013-09-06. Archived ตุลาคม 25, 2011 ที่ เวย์แบ็กแมชชีน.
  232. ↑ "Fukushima Starts Long Road To Recovery". NPR. 2012-03-10. Archived from the original on 2013-12-19. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2012-04-16.
  233. ↑ "Neon city goes dim as power shortage threatens traffic lights and telephones in Tokyo". news.com.au. 15 March 2011. Archived from the original on 2011-03-15.
  234. ↑ Yuri Kageyama, dealing with power shortage. Associated Press, 22 May 2011 [ลิงก์เสีย]
  235. ↑ Benjamin K. Sovacool (2011). Contesting the Future of Nuclear Power: A Critical Global Assessment of Atomic Energy, World Scientific, p. 287.
  236. ↑ http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/29/business/energy-environment/29iht-sustain.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
  237. ↑ David MacKay. "David MacKay: A reality check on renewables - TED Talk - TED.com". สืบค้นเมื่อ 12 June 2015.
  238. ↑ George Monbiot. "Why Fukushima made me stop worrying and love nuclear power". the Guardian. สืบค้นเมื่อ 12 June 2015.
  239. ↑ "Why This Matters". สืบค้นเมื่อ 12 June 2015.
  240. ↑ "The Moral Case for Nuclear Power". สืบค้นเมื่อ 12 June 2015.
  241. ↑ "How the Greens Were Misled". สืบค้นเมื่อ 12 June 2015.
  242. ↑ Mycle Schneider (9 September 2011). "Fukushima crisis: Can Japan be at the forefront of an authentic paradigm shift?". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. Archived from the original on 2013-01-06.
  243. ↑ Dr. Ken Caldeira, Senior Scientist, Department of Global Ecology, Carnegie Institution, Dr. Kerry Emanuel, Atmospheric Scientist, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dr. James Hansen, Climate Scientist, Columbia University Earth Institute, Dr. Tom Wigley, Climate Scientist, University of Adelaide and the National Center for Atmospheric Research. "There is no credible path to climate stabilization that does not include a substantial role for nuclear power". cnn.com.CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list (link)
  244. ↑ Barry W. Brook - Professor of Environmental Sustainability at University of Tasmania, Corey Bradshaw Professor and Director of Ecological Modelling at University of Adelaide. "It's time for environmentalists to give nuclear a fair go". theconversation.com.
  245. 1 2 "Japan Plans Floating Wind Power Plant". Breakbulk. 16 September 2011. Archived from the original on 2012-05-21. สืบค้นเมื่อ 12 October 2011.
  246. ↑ Elaine Kurtenbach. "Japan starts up offshore wind farm near Fukushima" The Sydney Morning Herald, 12 November 2013. Accessed: 11 November 2013. Archived ธันวาคม 30, 2013 ที่ เวย์แบ็กแมชชีน.
  247. ↑ Joshua S Hill (2013-12-11). "Canadian Solar Signs Loan Agreement For Japan Development". CleanTechnica. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2013-12-30.
  248. ↑ Carol J. Williams (14 September 2012). "In wake of Fukushima disaster, Japan to end nuclear power by 2030s". LA Times. Archived from the original on 2014-01-23.
  249. ↑ Gerhardt, Tina (22 July 2012). "After Fukushima, Nuclear Power on Collision Course With Japanese Public". Alternet. Archived from the original on 2013-10-14. สืบค้นเมื่อ 8 August 2013.
  250. ↑ "Abe dismisses Koizumi's call for zero nuclear power plants". Asahi Shimbun. 2013-10-25. Archived from the original on 2014-04-13. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2013-12-30.
  251. ↑ "Supporters of zero nuclear power "irresponsible": Abe". Archived from the original on 2013-10-29.
  252. ↑ "Most Japan cities hosting nuclear plants OK restart: survey". Bangkok Post. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2013-12-30. [ลิงก์เสีย]
  253. ↑ United Press International (2 June 2013). "60,000 protest Japan's plan to restart nuclear power plants". UPI Asia. Archived from the original on 2013-10-29.
  254. ↑ "Japan's Fuel Costs May Rise to 7.5 Trillion Yen, Meti Estimates". Archived from the original on 2013-10-09.
  255. ↑ Maeda, Risa (20 October 2011). "Japanese nuclear plant survived tsunami, offers clues". Reuters. Archived from the original on 2011-10-25. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2013-10-27.
  256. ↑ IAEA Expert Team Concludes Mission to Onagawa NPP Archived ตุลาคม 29, 2013 ที่ เวย์แบ็กแมชชีน.
  257. ↑ Japanese nuclear plant ‘remarkably undamaged’ in earthquake – UN atomic agency. Archived ตุลาคม 29, 2013 ที่ เวย์แบ็กแมชชีน.
  258. ↑ Hydrogen fix for Japanese reactors Archived กุมภาพันธ์ 14, 2014 ที่ เวย์แบ็กแมชชีน.
  259. ↑ Hydrogen recombiners at all 20 NPC plants to avoid Fukushima. Sanjay Jog | Mumbai 7 April 2011 Last Updated at 00:29 IST Archived ตุลาคม 29, 2013 ที่ เวย์แบ็กแมชชีน.
  260. ↑ CFD analysis of passive autocatalytic recombiner interaction with atmosphere. Archive Kerntechnik - Issue 2011/02. Archived ตุลาคม 29, 2013 ที่ เวย์แบ็กแมชชีน.
  261. ↑ Daly, Matthew (10 March 2013). "Nuclear chief: U.S. plants safer after Japan crisis. March 10, 2013". USA Today.
  262. ↑ "Vents and Filtering Strategies Come to Forefront in Fukushima Response Nuclear Energy Insight. Fall 2012". Archived from the original on 2013-10-29.
  263. ↑ "TEPCO implements new safety measures in bid to restart Niigata reactors". Archived from the original on 2014-04-13.
  264. ↑ "Kashiwazaki-Kariwa plant shown to reporters". Archived from the original on 2013-10-29.
  265. ↑ Nuclear power plant operator in China orders backup batteries for installation at plants 7 September 2012 Archived ตุลาคม 29, 2013 ที่ เวย์แบ็กแมชชีน.
  266. ↑ China’s Guangdong Nuclear Power Corp Announces Orders for BYD Battery Back-up for Nuclear Plants Archived ตุลาคม 29, 2013 ที่ เวย์แบ็กแมชชีน.
  267. ↑ The Notstand building, a bunkered facility which could support all of the plant systems for at least 72 hours given a severe flood or earthquake which could take out the normal power and cooling facilities. I asked Martin Richner, the head of risk assessment, why Beznau spent so much money on the Notstand building when there was no regulation or government directive to do so. Martin answered me, "Woody, we live here." Archived ตุลาคม 14, 2013 ที่ เวย์แบ็กแมชชีน.
  268. ↑ "A PRA Practioner Looks at the Fukushima Daiichi Accident".
  269. ↑ "2012 20th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering and the ASME 2012 Power Conference". Archived from the original on 2013-12-15.
  270. ↑ "Gen III reactor design 04/06/2011 By Brian Wheeler Associate Editor". Archived from the original on 2013-12-14.
  271. ↑ "Nuclear Science and Techniques 24 (2013) 040601 Study on the long-term passive cooling extension of AP1000 reactor". Archived from the original on 2013-12-14.
  272. 1 2 Dahl, Fredrik (15 August 2011). "U.N. atom body wants wider nuclear safety checks". Reuters. Archived from the original on 2014-05-06.
  273. ↑ Brasor, Philip, "Public wary of official optimism", Japan Times, 11 March 2012, p. 11. Archived มกราคม 3, 2013 ที่ เวย์แบ็กแมชชีน.
  274. 1 2 Norimitsu Onishi (8 August 2011). "Japan Held Nuclear Data, Leaving Evacuees in Peril". The New York Times. [ลิงก์เสีย]
  275. 1 2 Charles Digges (10 August 2011). "Japan ignored its own radiation forecasts in days following disaster, imperiling thousands". Bellona. Archived from the original on 2012-03-18.
  276. ↑ "Analysis: A month on, Japan nuclear crisis still scarring," International Business Times (Australia). 9 April 2011, retrieved 12 April 2011; excerpt, According to James Acton, Associate of the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, "Fukushima is not the worst nuclear accident ever but it is the most complicated and the most dramatic ... This was a crisis that played out in real time on TV. Chernobyl did not." ถูกบันทึกไว้ 18 เมษายน 2554 ที่ WebCite
  277. ↑ HASEGAWA, KOICHI. 2012 "Facing Nuclear Risks: Lessons from the Fukushima Nuclear Disaster." International Journal of Japanese Sociology 21(1):84-91. Retrieved from EBSCOhost on 12 November 2012
  278. ↑ Hiroko Tabuchi (13 July 2011). "Japan Premier Wants Shift Away From Nuclear Power". The New York Times.
  279. ↑ Naoto Kan (2013-10-28). "Encountering the Fukushima Daiichi Accident". The Huffington Post. Archived from the original on 2014-01-25. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2013-11-09.
  280. ↑ (dutch)Nu.nl (22 August 2011)Area around Fukushima maybe a forbidden zone for decades to come Archived ตุลาคม 23, 2013 ที่ เวย์แบ็กแมชชีน.
  281. ↑ The Guardian (22 August 2011)residents may never return to radiation-hit homes Archived สิงหาคม 23, 2011 ที่ เวย์แบ็กแมชชีน.
  282. ↑ Earthquake Report – JAIF, No. 45: 20:00, 7 April. JAIF / NHK, 7 April 2011, archived from original on 9 April 2011, Retrieved 9 April 2011.
  283. ↑ Al-Jazeera English: Citizen group tracks down Japan's radiation (10 August 2011) Archived สิงหาคม 31, 2011 ที่ เวย์แบ็กแมชชีน.
  284. ↑ Safecast Organization Official Blog Archived เมษายน 15, 2014 ที่ เวย์แบ็กแมชชีน.
  285. ↑ Franken, Pieter (17 January 2014). "Volunteers Crowdsource Radiation Monitoring to Map Potential Risk on Every Street in Japan" (Interview). Interviewed by Amy Goodman. Archived from the original on 2014-04-25. สืบค้นเมื่อ 17 January 2014. Unknown parameter |program= ignored (help); Unknown parameter |city= ignored (help)
  286. ↑ UC Berkeley Nuclear Engineering Air Monitoring Station | The Nuclear Engineering Department at UC Berkely web site ถูกบันทึกไว้ 1 เมษายน 2554 ที่ WebCite
  287. ↑ "USS Ronald Reagan Exposed to Radiation". Navy Handbook. 14 March 2011. Archived from the original on 2013-11-10. สืบค้นเมื่อ 18 March 2011.
  288. ↑ Grimes, Robin (2014-06-16). "The UK Response to Fukushima and Anglo-Japanese Relations". Science & Diplomacy. 3 (2).
  289. ↑ "IAEA sees slow nuclear growth post Japan". UPI. 23 September 2011. Archived from the original on 2014-03-09.
  290. ↑ Nucléaire : une trentaine de réacteurs dans le monde risquent d'être fermés Les Échos, published 12 April 2011, accessed 15 April 2011
  291. ↑ "Gauging the pressure". The Economist. 28 April 2011. Archived from the original on 2011-05-05.
  292. ↑ RAFAEL POCH (2011-05-31). "Merkel se despide de lo nuclear y anuncia una revolución en renovables" (in Spanish). LAVANGUARDIA.com. สืบค้นเมื่อ 26 January 2014.CS1 maint: Unrecognized language (link)
  293. ↑ "Italy nuclear: Berlusconi accepts referendum blow". BBC News. 14 June 2011. Archived from the original on 2011-06-12. สืบค้นเมื่อ 26 January 2014.
  294. ↑ "France struggles to cut down on nuclear power". BBC News. สืบค้นเมื่อ 12 June 2015.
  295. ↑ Rob Broomby (11 January 2014). "France struggles to cut down on nuclear power". BBC News Magazine. Archived from the original on 2014-02-07. สืบค้นเมื่อ 26 January 2014.
  296. ↑ "China Nuclear Power - Chinese Nuclear Energy". สืบค้นเมื่อ 12 June 2015.
  297. ↑ http://www.kpmg.com/Global/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/Documents/nuclear-power-role-in-shaping-energy-policies-v3.pdf
  298. ↑ Shannon Tiezzi, The Diplomat. "Why China Will Go All-In on Nuclear Power". The Diplomat. สืบค้นเมื่อ 12 June 2015.
  299. ↑ "Nuclear Power in South Korea". สืบค้นเมื่อ 12 June 2015.
  300. ↑ "Nuclear energy only option before country: Ansari". The Indian Express. 20 October 2012. สืบค้นเมื่อ 12 June 2015.
  301. ↑ and Prime Minister Modi announced that India to build 10 more nuclear reactors with Russia. http://www.ibtimes.co.in/tv/modi-india-to-build-10-more-nuclear-reactors-with-russia-28373
  302. ↑ "Fukushima nuclear accident 'man-made', not natural disaster". Bloomberg L.P. The Sydney Morning Herald. Archived from the original on 2013-11-03. สืบค้นเมื่อ 9 July 2012.
  303. ↑ "Japan says Fukushima disaster was 'man-made'". Al Jazeera and agencies. AL Jazeera English. 5 July 2012. Archived from the original on 2014-01-30. สืบค้นเมื่อ 9 July 2012.
  304. ↑ "Official website of the Investigation Committee on the Accident at the Fukushima Nuclear Power Stations of Tokyo Electric Power Company". Archived from the original on 2011-07-31. สืบค้นเมื่อ 29 July 2012. This committee was established with the aim of conducting an investigation to determine the causes of the accident that occurred at Fukushima Daiichi and Daini Nuclear Power Stations of Tokyo Electric Power Company, and those of the damages generated by the accident, and thereby making policy proposals designed to prevent the expansion of the damages and the recurrence of similar accidents in the future.
  305. 1 2 "Japan nuclear plants 'still not safe'". Al Jazeera Online. 23 July 2012. Archived from the original on 2014-04-16. สืบค้นเมื่อ 29 July 2012.
  306. ↑ "Japan, TEPCO ignored atomic accident risks due to 'myth of nuclear safety': Report". Asian News International (ANI). News Track India. 23 July 2012. Archived from the original on 2013-12-25. สืบค้นเมื่อ 29 July 2012.
  307. ↑ Mitsuru Obe and Eleanor Warnock (23 July 2012). "Japan Panel Says Plant Operator Falls Short on Nuclear Safety". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 2013-09-27. สืบค้นเมื่อ 30 July 2012.
  308. ↑ Tsuyoshi Inajima and Yuji Okada (23 July 2012). "Fukushima Investigators Say More Study Needed on What Went Wrong". Bloomsberg Businessweek. Archived from the original on 2013-09-28. สืบค้นเมื่อ 29 July 2012.
  309. ↑ Hancocks, Paula (23 July 2012). "New report criticizes TEPCO over Fukushima nuclear crisis". CNN. Archived from the original on 2013-12-26. สืบค้นเมื่อ 29 July 2012.
  310. ↑ Kazuaki Nagata (24 July 2012). "Government, Tepco again hit for nuke crisis". The Japan Times. Archived from the original on 2012-11-01. สืบค้นเมื่อ 29 July 2012.
  311. Richard Tanter (October–December 2013, Vol. 37, No. 4). "After Fukushima: A Survey of Corruption in the Global Nuclear Power Industry". Asian Perspective. Check date values in: |date= (help)
  312. "Areas to which evacuation orders have been issued" (PDF). 7 August 2013.
  313. "Designating and Rearranging the Areas of Evacuation (pg 7)" (PDF).
  314. "Japan to fire 3 top nuclear officials – CNN". Articles.cnn.com. 4 August 2011. Archived from the original on 2011-08-19. สืบค้นเมื่อ 11 August 2011.
  315. Kaufmann, Daniel and Veronika Penciakova (17 March 2011). "Japan's triple disaster: Governance and the earthquake, tsunami and nuclear crises". Brookings Institution. Archived from the original on 2012-05-03.
  316. Jeff Kingston (10 September 2012). "Japan's Nuclear Village". Japan Focus. Archived from the original on 2014-03-29.
  317. Culture of complicity tied to stricken nuclear plant, NYTimes, 27 April 2011
  318. Hongo, Jun (29 February 2012). "Panel lays bare Fukushima recipe for disaster". Japan Times. p. 1. Archived from the original on 2012-02-29.
  319. "Disaster response robots", Open Minds blog, featuring BBC Documentary Archived กุมภาพันธ์ 22, 2014 ที่ เวย์แบ็กแมชชีน.
  320. Yoichi Funabashi (11 March 2012). "The End of Japanese Illusions". New York Times.

Sources

Cited

Other

  • Caldicott, Helen [ed.]: Crisis Without End: The Medical and Ecological Consequences of the Fukushima Nuclear Catastrophe. [From the "Symposium at the New York Academy of Medicine, March 11–12, 2013"]. The New Press, 2014. ISBN 978-1-59558-970-5 (eBook)


ธรณีวิทยา
พื้นที่ได้รับ
ผลกระทบ
พื้นที่
เสียหาย
หนัก
สาธารณูปโภค
ที่ได้รับผลกระทบ
อุบัติภัยนิวเคลียร์

ใกล้เคียง

ภัยพิบัติเชียร์โนบีล ภัยพิบัตินิวเคลียร์ฟูกูชิมะแห่งที่หนึ่ง ภัยพิบัติแห่งอียิปต์ ภัยพิบัติทางอากาศมิวนิก ภัยพิบัติกระสวยอวกาศแชลเลนเจอร์ ภัยพิบัติท่าอากาศยานเตเนริเฟ ภัยพิบัติสนามกีฬากันจูรูฮัน ภัยพิบัติกอสตากอนกอร์เดีย ภัยพิบัติเรือผู้อพยพในเมซีนีอา พ.ศ. 2566 ภัยพิบัติฮิลส์โบโร

แหล่งที่มา

WikiPedia: ภัยพิบัตินิวเคลียร์ฟูกูชิมะแห่งที่หนึ่ง http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/special-reports/o... http://www.news.com.au/world/neon-city-goes-dim-as... http://www.smh.com.au/world/fukushima-nuclear-acci... http://www.smh.com.au/world/japan-starts-up-offsho... http://canceraustralia.gov.au/affected-cancer/canc... http://www.engineersaustralia.org.au/shadomx/apps/... http://www.ctv.ca/CTVNews/TopStories/20120217/japa... http://www.j.sinap.ac.cn/nst/EN/article/downloadAr... http://www.aljazeera.com/news/asia-pacific/2012/07... http://www.aljazeera.com/news/asia-pacific/2012/07...