อ้างอิง ของ ลัทธิกีดกันทางเพศ

  1. 1 2 มีความเห็นร่วมกันอย่างชัดเจนและกว้างในหมู่นักวิชาการในสาขาต่างๆที่เกี่ยวกับเรื่องเพศ ซึ่งหมายถึงการเลือกปฏิบัติต่อสตรีและมีผลต่อผู้หญิงเป็นหลัก ดูตัวอย่างเช่น
    • "Sexism". New Oxford American Dictionary (3 ed.). Oxford University Press. 2010. ISBN 9780199891535. Defines sexism as "prejudice, stereotyping, or discrimination, typically against women, on the basis of sex".
    • "Sexism". Encyclopædia Britannica, Online Academic Edition. 2015. Defines sexism as "prejudice or discrimination based on sex or gender, especially against women and girls". Notes that "sexism in a society is most commonly applied against women and girls. It functions to maintain patriarchy, or male domination, through ideological and material practices of individuals, collectives, and institutions that oppress women and girls on the basis of sex or gender."
    • Cudd, Ann E.; Jones, Leslie E. (2005). "Sexism". A Companion to Applied Ethics. London: Blackwell. Notes that "'Sexism' refers to a historically and globally pervasive form of oppression against women."
    • Masequesmay, Gina (2008). "Sexism". In O'Brien, Jodi. Encyclopedia of Gender and Society. SAGE. Notes that "sexism usually refers to prejudice or discrimination based on sex or gender, especially against women and girls". Also states that "sexism is an ideology or practices that maintain patriarchy or male domination".
    • Hornsby, Jennifer (2005). "Sexism". In Honderich, Ted. The Oxford Companion to Philosophy (2 ed.). Oxford. Defines sexism as "thought or practice which may permeate language and which assumes women's inferiority to men".
    • "Sexism". Collins Dictionary of Sociology. Harper Collins. 2006. Defines sexism as "any devaluation or denigration of women or men, but particularly women, which is embodied in institutions and social relationships."
    • "Sexism". Palgrave MacMillan Dictionary of Political Thought. Palgrave MacMillan. 2007. Notes that "either sex may be the object of sexist attitudes... however, it is commonly held that, in developed societies, women have been the usual victims".
    • "Sexism". The Greenwood Encyclopedia of Love, Courtship, and Sexuality through History, Volume 6: The Modern World. Greenwood. 2007. "Sexism is any act, attitude, or institutional configuration that systematically subordinates or devalues women. Built upon the belief that men and women are constitutionally different, sexism takes these differences as indications that men are inherently superior to women, which then is used to justify the nearly universal dominance of men in social and familial relationships, as well as politics, religion, language, law, and economics."
    • Foster, Carly Hayden (2011). "Sexism". In Kurlan, George Thomas. The Encyclopedia of Political Science. CQ Press. ISBN 9781608712434. Notes that "both men and women can experience sexism, but sexism against women is more pervasive".
    • Johnson, Allan G. (2000). "Sexism". The Blackwell Dictionary of Sociology. Blackwell. Suggests that "the key test of whether something is sexist... lies in its consequences: if it supports male privilege, then it is by definition sexist. I specify 'male privilege' because in every known society where gender inequality exists, males are privileged over females."
    • Lorber, Judith (2011). Gender Inequality: Feminist Theories and Politics. Oxford University Press. p. 5. Notes that "although we speak of gender inequality, it is usually women who are disadvantaged relative to similarly situated men".
    • Wortman, Camille B.; Loftus, Elizabeth S.; Weaver, Charles A (1999). Psychology. McGraw-Hill. "As throughout history, today women are the primary victims of sexism, prejudice directed at one sex, even in the United States."
  2. Matsumoto, 2001. P.197.
  3. Nakdimen KA The American Journal of Psychiatry [1984, 141(4):499-503]
  4. Doob, Christopher B. 2013. Social Inequality and Social Stratification in US Society. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
  5. Forcible Rape Institutionalized Sexism in the Criminal Justice System| Gerald D. Robin Division of Criminal Justice, University of New Haven
  6. Shorter Oxford English Dictionary, 6th edition
  7. Brittan, Arthur (1984). Sexism, racism and oppression. Blackwell. p. 236. ISBN 9780855206748 Check |isbn= value: checksum (help).
  8. "Feminism Friday: The origins of the word "sexism"". Finallyfeminism101.wordpress.com. October 19, 2007. สืบค้นเมื่อ July 20, 2013.
  9. Siegel, Daniel J. (February 16, 2015). The Wise Legacy: How One Professor Transformed the Nation. CreateSpace. p. 54. ISBN 9781507625590. สืบค้นเมื่อ 12 September 2015.
  10. "Feminism Friday: The origins of the word "sexism"". Finallyfeminism101.wordpress.com. October 19, 2007. สืบค้นเมื่อ July 20, 2013.
  11. "Feminism Friday: The origins of the word "sexism"". Finallyfeminism101.wordpress.com. October 19, 2007. สืบค้นเมื่อ July 20, 2013.
  12. "PM's sexism rant prompts Australian dictionary rewrite". CNN. October 19, 2012.
  13. Thurston 2001. p. 01.
  14. Barstow, Anne Llewellyn (1994) Witchcraze: A New History of the European Witch Hunts San Francisco: Pandora.
  15. Thurston 2001. pp. 42-45.
  16. "Saudi woman beheaded for 'witchcraft and sorcery' - CNN.com". CNN. December 14, 2011.
  17. The World Health Organization. World report on violence and health: Chapter 5 abuse of the elderly Retrieved 17 April 2015 from http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/violence/global_campaign/en/chap5.pdf
  18. AFP, By Deepesh Shrestha, in Pyutar for. "Witch-hunts of low-caste women in Nepal".
  19. Iaccino, Ludovica (22 July 2014). "Witch Hunting in India: Poor, Low Caste and Widows Main Targets".
  20. Allwood, Gill (1999). "Women in France" (PDF). Modern and Contemporary France. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. 7. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-03-04.
  21. "France's leading women show the way". Parisvoice.com. Archived from the original on July 28, 2013. สืบค้นเมื่อ July 20, 2013.
  22. "Lesson - The French Civil Code (Napoleonic Code) - Teaching Women's Rights From Past to Present". Womeninworldhistory.com. สืบค้นเมื่อ July 20, 2013.
  23. Benhold, K (2010) 20 years after fall of wall, women of former East Germany thrive. The New York Times. Retrieved 17 April 2015 from https://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/06/world/europe/06iht-letter.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all
  24. Trzcinski, E. & Holst, E. (2010) Gender differences in subjective well-being in and out of management positions. Deutsches Institut fur Wirtschaftsforschung. Retrieve 17 April 2015 from http://www.diw.de/documents/publikationen/73/diw_01.c.356386.de/dp998.pdf
  25. "Spain - Social Values And Attitudes". Countrystudies.us. สืบค้นเมื่อ July 20, 2013.
  26. "The History of Passports in Australia". 14 June 2006. Archived from the original on 14 June 2006.
  27. Amnesty International (2009) Yemen's dark side: Discrimination and violence against women and girls. Retrieved 17 April 2015 from http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrc/docs/ngos/Yemen%27s%20darkside-discrimination_Yemen_HRC101.pdf
  28. "The law states: "The punishment of a wife by her husband, the disciplining by parents and teachers of children under their authority [is permitted] within certain limits prescribed by law or by custom"" (PDF). Law.case.edu. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-10-21. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2015-03-31.
  29. "THE WAR WITHIN THE WAR". Hrw.org. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2015-03-31.
  30. "HANDBOOK FOR LEGISLATION ON VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN: Supplement to the "Harmful Practices" against Women" (PDF). New York: UN Women. 2012.
  31. Sfeir, George N. (1 January 1957). "The Tunisian Code of Personal Status (Majallat Al-Ahw Al Al-Shakhsiy Ah)". Middle East Journal. 11 (3): 309–318. doi:10.2307/4322925 (inactive 2017-09-15). JSTOR 4322925.
  32. "Article 13 reads in French: "Le mari ne peut, s'il n'a pas acquitté la dot, contraindre la femme à la consommation du mariage" http://www.jurisitetunisie.com/tunisie/codes/csp/Csp1015.htm
  33. "7 raisons pour les hommes et les femmes de remettre en cause le CSP... ou pas". Al Huffington Post. สืบค้นเมื่อ 14 June 2015.
  34. "Nouveaux progrès, mais il ne faut pas pour autant pavoiser". Le Temps. สืบค้นเมื่อ 14 June 2015.
  35. FIDH. "Les violences sexuelles en Tunisie : après le déni, un début de (...)". FIDH - Worldwide Human Rights Movement. สืบค้นเมื่อ 14 June 2015.
  36. "Timeline of Women's Suffrage Granted, by Country". Infoplease. สืบค้นเมื่อ 1 December 2013.
  37. "The Long Way to Women's Right to Vote in Switzerland: a Chronology". History-switzerland.geschichte-schweiz.ch. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2011-01-08.
  38. Jean-Pierre Maury. "Ordonnance du 21 avril 1944 relative à l'organisation des pouvoirs publics en France après la Libération". Mjp.univ-perp.fr. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2011-01-08.
  39. Assemblée nationale. "La citoyenneté politique des femmes – La décision du Général de Gaulle" (in French). สืบค้นเมื่อ 2007-12-19.CS1 maint: Unrecognized language (link)
  40. Kerstin Teske: teske@fczb.de. "European Database: Women in Decision-making - Country Report Greece". db-decision.de.
  41. "BBC News - Timeline: Liechtenstein". สืบค้นเมื่อ 14 June 2015.
  42. "Liechtenstein Women Win Right to Vote". The New York Times. 2 July 1984.
  43. Kittilson, Miki Caul; Fridkin, Kim (2008). "Gender, Candidate Portrayals and Election Campaigns: A Comparative Perspective". Politics & Gender. 4 (3). doi:10.1017/S1743923X08000330. ISSN 1743-923X.
  44. 1 2 Kittilson, Miki Caul; Fridkin, Kim (2008). "Gender, Candidate Portrayals and Election Campaigns: A Comparative Perspective". Politics & Gender. 4 (3). doi:10.1017/S1743923X08000330. ISSN 1743-923X.
  45. Chen, Lanyan (2009). The Gendered Reality of Migrant Workers in Globalizing China. Ottawa: The University of Ottawa. pp. 186–207. ISBN 978-0-7766-0709-2.
  46. OECD. OECD Employment Outlook - 2008 Edition Summary in English. OECD, Paris, 2008, p. 3-4.
  47. The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. "Facts About Compensation Discrimination". สืบค้นเมื่อ 2008-04-23.
  48. OECD. OECD Employment Outlook - 2008 Edition Summary in English. OECD, Paris, 2008, p. 3-4.
  49. Folbre, Nancy. The Anti-Mommy Bias. New York Times, March 26, 2009.
  50. Goodman, Ellen. A third gender in the workplace. Boston Globe, May 11, 2007.
  51. Cahn, Naomi and June Carbone. Five myths about working mothers. The Washington Post, May 30, 2010.
  52. Young, Lauren. The Motherhood Penalty: Working Moms Face Pay Gap Vs. Childless Peers. Bloomsberg Businessweek, June 05, 2009.
  53. Correll, Shelley, Stephen Benard, In Paik (2007.) Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty? American Journal of Sociology, Vol 112, No. 5, pp. 1297-1338, doi:10.1086/511799.
  54. News.cornell.edu. Mothers face disadvantages in getting hired. August 4, 2005.
  55. Wendy M. Williams (2015). "National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 112 (17): 5360–5365. Bibcode:2015PNAS..112.5360W. doi:10.1073/pnas.1418878112. สืบค้นเมื่อ 14 June 2015.
  56. Sarah Kaplan (14 April 2015). "Study finds, surprisingly, that women are favored for jobs in STEM". Washington Post. สืบค้นเมื่อ 14 June 2015.
  57. European Commission. The situation in the EU. Retrieved on August 19, 2011.
  58. OECD. OECD Employment Outlook - 2008 Edition Summary in English. OECD, Paris, 2008, p. 3-4.
  59. OECD. OECD Employment Outlook. Chapter 3: The Price of Prejudice: Labour Market Discrimination on the Grounds of Gender and Ethnicity. OECD, Paris, 2008.
  60. U.S. Census Bureau. Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2009. Current Population Reports, P60-238, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 2010, pp. 7 and 50.
  61. Institute for Women's Policy Research. The Gender Wage Gap: 2009. Retrieved March 31, 2011.
  62. U.S. Census Bureau. Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2009. Current Population Reports, P60-238, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 2010, pp. 7 and 50.
  63. Badgett, M.L., Lau, H., Sears, B., & Ho, D. (2007) Bias in the Workplace: Consistent Evidence of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Discrimination. Los Angeles: The Williams Institute. https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/research/workplace/bias-in-the-workplace-consistent-evidence-of-sexual-orientation-and-gender-identity-discrimination/
  64. Steinmetz, Katy (12 January 2015). "Does Saks have the legal right to fire a transgender employee?". TIME magazine. Fortune. สืบค้นเมื่อ 20 April 2015.

แหล่งที่มา

WikiPedia: ลัทธิกีดกันทางเพศ http://www.passports.gov.au/Web/passport_history.a... http://history-switzerland.geschichte-schweiz.ch/c... http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion... http://www.businessweek.com/careers/workingparents... http://edition.cnn.com/2011/12/13/world/meast/saud... http://www.cnn.com/2012/10/19/world/asia/australia... http://finduslaw.com/taxonomy_menu/12/23/13 http://fortune.com/2015/01/12/saks-transgender-fir... http://www.huffpostmaghreb.com/2013/08/13/raisons-... http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0931343.html