อ้างอิง ของ ความลำเอียงทางเพศบนวิกิพีเดีย

  1. What Makes Wikipedia's Volunteer Editors Volunteer?
  2. "University of Minnesota researchers reveal Wikipedia gender biases". University of Minnesota. Archived from the original on 8 December 2016. สืบค้นเมื่อ 21 November 2016.
  3. "Tackling Wikipedia's Gender Gap". West Virginia University. Archived from the original on 7 March 2016. สืบค้นเมื่อ 3 March 2016.
  4. 1 2 Montellaro, Zach (18 November 2015). "How Does Political Wikipedia Stay Apolitical?: The seventh-most visited site is one of the first online listings for any elected official—but how does a site that stakes its reputation on neutrality walk that line". www.theatlantic.com. The Atlantic. Archived from the original on 21 August 2017. สืบค้นเมื่อ 20 August 2017.
  5. Andrew Lih (20 June 2015). "Can Wikipedia Survive?". www.nytimes.com. Washington. Archived from the original on 21 June 2015. สืบค้นเมื่อ 21 June 2015. ...the considerable and often-noted gender gap among Wikipedia editors; in 2011, less than 15 percent were women.
  6. Statistics based on Wikimedia Foundation Wikipedia editor surveys 2011 (Nov. 2010-April 2011) and November 2011 Archived 5 June 2016 at the Wayback Machine. (April – October 2011)
  7. 1 2 Hill, Benjamin Mako; Shaw, Aaron; Sánchez, Angel (26 June 2013). "The Wikipedia Gender Gap Revisited: Characterizing Survey Response Bias with Propensity Score Estimation". PLoS ONE. 8 (6): e65782. Bibcode:2013PLoSO...865782H. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0065782. PMC 3694126. PMID 23840366. Archived from the original on 14 December 2014.
  8. 1 2 3 4 Cohen, Noam (30 January 2011). "Define Gender Gap? Look Up Wikipedia's Contributor List". New York Times. Archived from the original on 3 February 2011. สืบค้นเมื่อ 31 January 2011.
  9. Reagle, Joseph. ""Free as in sexist?": Free culture and the gender gap". First Monday. Archived from the original on 20 May 2015. สืบค้นเมื่อ 10 October 2015.
  10. "Joseph Reagle on the gender gap in geek culture". 26 February 2013. Archived from the original on 17 November 2015. สืบค้นเมื่อ 10 October 2015.
  11. "WP:Clubhouse? An Exploration of Wikipedia's Gender Imbalance" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 18 April 2015.
  12. arXiv, Emerging Technology from the. "Computational Linguistics Reveals How Wikipedia Articles Are Biased Against Women". MIT Technology Review (in อังกฤษ). สืบค้นเมื่อ 21 August 2017.
  13. The Guardian 2014 (London) The Guardian view on Wikipedia: evolving truth Archived November 12, 2016, at the Wayback Machine.
  14. Glott, Ruediger; Schmidt, Philipp; Ghosh, Rishab (March 2010). "Wikipedia Survey: Overview Results" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 14 April 2010. สืบค้นเมื่อ 11 August 2014.
  15. "Where Are the Women in Wikipedia?". New York Times. 2 February 2011. Archived from the original on 15 July 2014. สืบค้นเมื่อ 9 August 2014.
  16. Herring, Susan C. (4 February 2011). "Communication Styles Make a Difference". New York Times (opinion). Archived from the original on 24 July 2014. สืบค้นเมื่อ 11 August 2014.
  17. Reagle, Joseph M. (4 February 2011). "'Open' Doesn't Include Everyone". New York Times (opinion). Archived from the original on 15 July 2014. สืบค้นเมื่อ 11 August 2014.
  18. Cassell, Justine (4 February 2011). "Editing Wars Behind the Scenes". New York Times (opinion). Archived from the original on 27 February 2017.
  19. Reagle, Joseph; Rhue, Lauren (2011). "Gender Bias in Wikipedia and Britannica". International Journal of Communication. Joseph Reagle & Lauren Rhue. 5: 1138–1158. Archived from the original on 22 March 2016.
  20. "Wikipedia Editors Study: Results From The Editor Survey, April 2011" (PDF). Wikipedia. April 2011. Archived (PDF) from the original on 26 December 2014. สืบค้นเมื่อ 18 May 2014.
  21. 1 2 Lam, Shyong K.; Uduwage, Anuradha; Dong, Zhenhua; Sen, Shilad; Musicant, David R.; Terveen, Loren; Reidl, John (October 2011). WP:Clubhouse? An Exploration of Wikipedia’s Gender Imbalance (PDF). WikiSym'11. ACM. Archived (PDF) from the original on 29 October 2013.
  22. Hargittai, Eszter; Shaw, Aaron (4 November 2014). "Mind the skills gap: the role of Internet know-how and gender in differentiated contributions to Wikipedia". Information, Communication & Society. 18: 1–19. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2014.957711.
  23. Bruce Maiman (23 September 2014). "Wikipedia grows up on college campuses". The Sacramento Bee. Archived from the original on 23 September 2014. สืบค้นเมื่อ 23 September 2014.
  24. Wagner, Claudia; Graells-Garrido, Eduardo; Garcia,, David; Menczer, Filippo (1 March 2016). "Women through the glass ceiling: gender asymmetries in Wikipedia". EPJ Data Science. 5 (5). doi:10.1140/epjds/s13688-016-0066-4.
  25. Shane-Simpson, Christina; Gillespie-Lynch, Kristen (January 2017). "Examining potential mechanisms underlying the Wikipedia gender gap through a collaborative editing task". Computers in Human Behavior. 66: 312–328. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.043.
  26. Ford, Heather; Wajcman, Judy (2017). "'Anyone can edit', not everyone does: Wikipedia and the gender gap". Social Studies of Science. 47: 511–527. doi:10.1177/0306312717692172. Archived from the original on 28 December 2016.
  27. 1 2 Gardner, Sue (19 February 2011). "Nine Reasons Why Women Don't Edit Wikipedia, In Their Own Words". suegardner.org (blog).
  28. Yasseri, Taha; Liao, Han-Teng; Konieczny, Piotr; Morgan, Jonathan; Bayer, Tilman (31 July 2013). "Recent research — Napoleon, Michael Jackson and Srebrenica across cultures, 90% of Wikipedia better than Britannica, WikiSym preview". The Signpost. Wikipedia. Archived from the original on 17 June 2015.
  29. "The women of Wikipedia: Closing the site's giant gender gap". Archived from the original on 3 July 2015.
  30. "In UK, rising chorus of outrage over online misogyny". CSMonitor.com. Archived from the original on 4 July 2015.
  31. Jonathan T. Morgan; Siko Bouterse; Sarah Stierch; Heather Walls. "Tea & Sympathy: Crafting Positive New User Experiences on Wikipedia" (PDF). Wikimedia Foundation. Archived (PDF) from the original on 5 November 2014.
  32. Elizabeth Harrington (30 July 2014). "Government-Funded Study: Why Is Wikipedia Sexist?". Washington Free Beacon. Archived from the original on 1 August 2014.
  33. Adams, Julia; Brückner, Hannah (27 December 2015). "Wikipedia, sociology, and the promise and pitfalls of Big Data". Big Data & Society. 2 (2). doi:10.1177/2053951715614332. ISSN 2053-9517.
  34. "Editors Are Trying To Fix Wikipedia's Gender And Racial Bias Problem". Archived from the original on 13 January 2016. สืบค้นเมื่อ 13 January 2016.
  35. "Project Aims to Raise Profile of Women Architects on Wikipedia". Archived from the original on 13 January 2016. สืบค้นเมื่อ 13 January 2016.
  36. "Does academia have a place on Wikipedia?". Archived from the original on 13 January 2016. สืบค้นเมื่อ 13 January 2016.
  37. Stoeffel (11 February 2014). "Closing Wikipedia's Gender Gap — Reluctantly". New York. Archived from the original on 2 September 2014. สืบค้นเมื่อ 27 August 2014.
  38. "The Wikipedia wars: does it matter if our biggest source of knowledge is written by men?". newstatesman.com. Archived from the original on 2 June 2015.
  39. "Class war! Wikipedia's workers revolt again • The Register". El Reg. 18 August 2014. Archived from the original on 29 December 2014. สืบค้นเมื่อ 4 December 2014.
  40. "Kate Middleton's wedding gown and Wikipedia's gender gap". 13 July 2012. Archived from the original on 3 December 2014. สืบค้นเมื่อ 4 December 2014.
  41. "Tea & Sympathy: Crafting Positive New User Experiences on Wikipedia". washington.edu. Proc. CSCW ‘13, 23–27 February 2013, San Antonio, Texas, USA. 2013. Archived from the original on 9 February 2015.
  42. Paling, Emma, "How Wikipedia Is Hostile to Women Archived 21 October 2015 at the Wayback Machine.", The Atlantic, 21 October 2015 แม่แบบ:Subscription or advertising

ใกล้เคียง

ความลับของนางฟ้า ความละเอียด 4K ความลำเอียงทางเพศบนวิกิพีเดีย ความลึกสี ความลับนางมารร้าย ความลับสุดยอดของคุณพ่อเลี้ยงเดี่ยว ความล้า ความละเอียดเชิงแสง ความล้มเหลว ความละเอียดการแสดงผลกราฟิก

แหล่งที่มา

WikiPedia: ความลำเอียงทางเพศบนวิกิพีเดีย http://www.businessinsider.com/growing-army-of-wom... http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Security-Watch/Back... http://www.dailydot.com/lifestyle/wikipedia-gender... http://www.dailydot.com/society/wikipedia-gender-g... http://www.dailydot.com/society/wikipedia-sexism-p... http://freebeacon.com/issues/government-funded-stu... http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/04/15/wikipedia... http://www.newstatesman.com/lifestyle/2015/05/wiki... http://www.nybooks.com/blogs/nyrblog/2013/apr/29/w... http://nymag.com/thecut/2014/02/closing-wikipedias...