อ้างอิง ของ ดีโดนี

  1. ↑ Phil Baines; Andrew Haslam (2005). Type & Typography. Laurence King Publishing. pp. 50–5. ISBN 978-1-85669-437-7.
  2. ↑ Tracy, Walter (1985). "Didot: an honoured name in French typography". Bulletin of the Printing Historical Society (14): 160–166.
  3. ↑ Coles, Stephen. "The Didot You Didn't Know". Typographica. สืบค้นเมื่อ 29 October 2017.
  4. ↑ Johnson, A. F. (1930). "The Evolution of the Modern-Face Roman". The Library. s4-XI (3): 353–377. doi:10.1093/library/s4-XI.3.353.
  5. ↑ Mosley, James. "Long s". Type Foundry. สืบค้นเมื่อ 11 August 2015.
  6. ↑ Wigglesworth, Bradford, Lieber (1830). Encyclopædia Americana - Didot. Carey, Lea & Carey.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (ลิงก์)
  7. ↑ Bodoni, Giambattista. Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, 6th Edition [serial online]. January 2009:1-1. Available from: Academic Search Premier, Ipswich, MA. Accessed August 7, 2009.
  8. ↑ Shaw, Paul (10 February 2011). "Overlooked Typefaces". Print magazine. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2 July 2015.
  9. ↑ Cees W. De Jong, Alston W. Purvis, and Friedrich Friedl. 2005. Creative Type: A Sourcebook of Classical and Contemporary Letterforms. Thames & Hudson. (223)
  10. ↑ Osterer, Heidrun; Stamm, Philipp (8 May 2014). Adrian Frutiger – Typefaces: The Complete Works. Walter de Gruyter. p. 362. ISBN 978-3038212607.
  11. ↑ Reed, Talbot Baines (1890). "Old and New Fashions in Typography". Journal of the Society of Arts. 38: 527–538. สืบค้นเมื่อ 17 September 2016.
  12. ↑ Phinney, Thomas. "Transitional & Modern Type Families". Graphic Design and Publishing Centre. คลังข้อมูลเก่าเก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 19 October 2015. สืบค้นเมื่อ 10 August 2015.
  13. ↑ Eliason, Craig (October 2015). ""Transitional" Typefaces: The History of a Typefounding Classification". Design Issues. 31 (4): 30–43. doi:10.1162/DESI_a_00349. S2CID 57569313.
  14. ↑ Shinn, Nick. "Modern Suite" (PDF). Shinntype. คลังข้อมูลเก่าเก็บจากแหล่งเดิม (PDF)เมื่อ 25 February 2021. สืบค้นเมื่อ 11 August 2015.
  15. ↑ Mosley, James. "Recasting Caslon Old Face". Type Foundry. สืบค้นเมื่อ 1 August 2015.
  16. ↑ Ovink, G.W. (1971). "Nineteenth-century reactions against the didone type model - I". Quaerendo. 1 (2): 18–31. doi:10.1163/157006971x00301. สืบค้นเมื่อ 20 February 2016.
  17. ↑ Ovink, G.W. (1971). "Nineteenth-century reactions against the didone type model - II". Quaerendo. 1 (4): 282–301. doi:10.1163/157006971x00239. สืบค้นเมื่อ 20 February 2016.
  18. ↑ Ovink, G.W. (1 January 1972). "Nineteenth-century reactions against the didone type model-III". Quaerendo. 2 (2): 122–128. doi:10.1163/157006972X00229.
  19. ↑ Johnson, A.F. (1931). "Old-Face Types in the Victorian Age" (PDF). Monotype Recorder. 30 (242): 5–15. สืบค้นเมื่อ 14 October 2016.
  20. ↑ Gray, Nicolete (1976). Nineteenth-century Ornamented Typefaces.
  21. ↑ Ovink, G. Willem (1973). "Review: Jan van Krimpen, A Letter to Philip Hofer". Quaerendo. 3 (3): 239–242. doi:10.1163/157006973X00237.
  22. ↑ Morison, Stanley (1937). "Type Designs of the Past and Present, Part 4". PM: 61–81. คลังข้อมูลเก่าเก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 2021-07-24. สืบค้นเมื่อ 4 June 2017.
  23. ↑ Morison, Stanley (1937). "Type Designs of the Past and Present, Part 3". PM: 17–81. คลังข้อมูลเก่าเก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 2017-09-04. สืบค้นเมื่อ 4 June 2017.

แหล่งที่มา

WikiPedia: ดีโดนี https://books.google.com/books?id=rs6gyb2hPF4C&pg=... https://books.google.com/books?id=R1BHAQAAMAAJ&pg=... http://typographica.org/on-typography/the-didot-yo... https://doi.org/10.1093%2Flibrary%2Fs4-XI.3.353 https://doi.org/10.1162%2FDESI_a_00349 https://doi.org/10.1163%2F157006971x00301 https://doi.org/10.1163%2F157006971x00239 https://doi.org/10.1163%2F157006972X00229 https://doi.org/10.1163%2F157006973X00237 http://typefoundry.blogspot.co.uk/2008/01/long-s.h...