อ้างอิง ของ โทรจิต

  1. Marks, David; Kammann, Richard. (2000). The Psychology of the Psychic. Prometheus Books. pp. 97-106. ISBN 1-57392-798-8
  2. Hyman, Ray. Evaluating Parapsychological Claims. In Robert J. Sternberg, Henry L. Roediger, Diane F. Halpern. (2007). Critical Thinking in Psychology. Cambridge University Press. pp. 216-231. ISBN 978-0521608343
  3. Jan Dalkvist (1994). Telepathic group communication of emotions as a function of belief in telepathy. Dept. of Psychology, Stockholm University. สืบค้นเมื่อ 5 October 2011. Within the scientific community however, the claim that psi anomalies exist or may exist is in general regarded with skepticism. One reason for this difference between the scientist and the non scientist is that the former relies on on his own experiences and anecdotal reports of psi phenomena, whereas the scientist at least officially requires replicable results from well controlled experiments to believe in such phenomena - results which according to the prevailing view among scientists, do not exist.
  4. Willem B. Drees (28 November 1998). Religion, Science and Naturalism. Cambridge University Press. pp. 242–. ISBN 978-0-521-64562-1. สืบค้นเมื่อ 5 October 2011. Let me take the example of claims in parapsychology regarding telepathy across spatial or temporal distances, apparently without a mediating physical process. Such claims are at odds with the scientific consensus.
  5. 1 2 Carroll, Robert Todd (2005). "The Skeptic's Dictionary; Telepathy". SkepDic.com. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2006-09-13.
  6. Glossary of Parapsychological terms - TelepathyParapsychological Association. Retrieved December 19, 2006.
บทความนี้ยังเป็นโครง คุณสามารถช่วยวิกิพีเดียได้โดยเพิ่มข้อมูล