อ้างอิง ของ การออกแบบอย่างชาญฉลาด

↑ Boudry, Maarten; Blancke, Stefaan; Braeckman, Johan (December 2010). "Irreducible Incoherence and Intelligent Design: A Look into the Conceptual Toolbox of a Pseudoscience". The Quarterly Review of Biology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. 85 (4): 473–482. doi:10.1086/656904. PMID 21243965. Article available from Universiteit Gent
↑ Pigliucci 2010
↑ "CSC - Top Questions: Questions About Intelligent Design: What is the theory of intelligent design?". Center for Science and Culture. Seattle, WA: Discovery Institute. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2012-06-16.
- "Intelligent Design Theory in a Nutshell" (PDF). Seattle, WA: Intelligent Design and Evolution Awareness Center. 2004. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2012-06-16.
- "Intelligent Design". Intelligent Design network. Shawnee Mission, KS: Intelligent Design network, inc. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2012-06-16.
↑ Forrest, Barbara (May 2007). "Understanding the Intelligent Design Creationist Movement: Its True Nature and Goals" (PDF). Center for Inquiry. Washington, D.C.: Center for Inquiry. Archived from the original (PDF) on May 19, 2011. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2007-08-06. Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (help)
↑ See:
- List of scientific societies explicitly rejecting intelligent design
- Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, 04 cv 2688 (December 20, 2005). Whether ID Is Science, p. 83
- The Discovery Institute's A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism petition begun in 2001 has been signed by "over 700 scientists" as of August 20, 2006. The four-day A Scientific Support for Darwinism petition gained 7,733 signatories from scientists opposing ID.
- AAAS 2002. The American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), the largest association of scientists in the U.S., has 120,000 members, and firmly rejects ID.
- More than 70,000 Australian scientists "...urge all Australian governments and educators not to permit the teaching or promulgation of ID as science."
- National Center for Science Education: List of statements from scientific professional organizations on the status intelligent design and other forms of creationism in the sciences.
- Nature Methods 2007, "Long considered a North American phenomenon, pro-ID interest groups can also be found throughout Europe. ...Concern about this trend is now so widespread in Europe that in October 2007 the Council of Europe voted on a motion calling upon member states to firmly oppose the teaching of creationism as a scientific discipline."
- Dean 2007, "There is no credible scientific challenge to the theory of evolution as an explanation for the complexity and diversity of life on earth."
↑ "An intelligently designed response". Nature Methods (Editorial). London: Nature Publishing Group. 4 (12): 983. December 2007. doi:10.1038/nmeth1207-983. ISSN 1548-7091. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2014-02-28.

ใกล้เคียง