อ้างอิง ของ พลังงานนิวเคลียร์

  • ชาณิกา ไชฮะกิจ จากสำนักงานพลังงานปรมาณูเพื่อสันติ
  • สมพร จองคำ กองฟิสิกส์ พปส http://www.egat.co.th/me/nuc/Knowledge/nuceng.html
  1. ↑ "Nuclear Energy". Energy Education is an interactive curriculum supplement for secondary-school science students, funded by the U. S. Department of Energy and the Texas State Energy Conservation Office (SECO). U. S. Department of Energy and the Texas State Energy Conservation Office (SECO). July 2010. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2010-07-10.
  2. ↑ "Key World Energy Statistics 2012" (PDF). International Energy Agency. 2012. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2012-12-17.
  3. 1 2 "PRIS - Home". Iaea.org. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2013-06-14.
  4. 1 2 "World Nuclear Power Reactors 2007-08 and Uranium Requirements". World Nuclear Association. 2008-06-09. Archived from the original on March 3, 2008. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2008-06-21.
  5. ↑ "Japan approves two reactor restarts". Taipei Times. 2013-06-07. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2013-06-14.
  6. ↑ "What is Nuclear Power Plant - How Nuclear Power Plants work | What is Nuclear Power Reactor - Types of Nuclear Power Reactors". EngineersGarage. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2013-06-14.
  7. ↑ "Nuclear-Powered Ships | Nuclear Submarines". World-nuclear.org. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2013-06-14.
  8. ↑ http://www.ewp.rpi.edu/hartford/~ernesto/F2010/EP2/Materials4Students/Misiaszek/NuclearMarinePropulsion.pdf Naval Nuclear Propulsion, Magdi Ragheb.As of 2001, about 235 naval reactors had been built
  9. 1 2 3 "Beyond ITER". The ITER Project. Information Services, Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory. Archived from the original on 7 November 2006. สืบค้นเมื่อ 5 February 2011. - Projected fusion power timeline
  10. ↑ Union-Tribune Editorial Board (March 27, 2011). "The nuclear controversy". Union-Tribune.
  11. 1 2 James J. MacKenzie. Review of The Nuclear Power Controversy by Arthur W. Murphy The Quarterly Review of Biology, Vol. 52, No. 4 (Dec., 1977), pp. 467-468.
  12. 1 2 In February 2010 the nuclear power debate played out on the pages of the New York Times, see A Reasonable Bet on Nuclear Power and Revisiting Nuclear Power: A Debate and A Comeback for Nuclear Power?
  13. 1 2 U.S. Energy Legislation May Be 'Renaissance' for Nuclear Power.
  14. 1 2 Share. "Nuclear Waste Pools in North Carolina". Projectcensored.org. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2010-08-24.
  15. 1 2 "Nuclear Power". Nc Warn. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2013-06-22.
  16. 1 2 Sturgis, Sue. "Investigation: Revelations about Three Mile Island disaster raise doubts over nuclear plant safety". Southernstudies.org. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2010-08-24.
  17. ↑ "Worldwide First Reactor to Start Up in 2013, in China - World Nuclear Industry Status Report". Worldnuclearreport.org. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2013-06-14.
  18. 1 2 3 Ayesha Rascoe (Feb 9, 2012). "U.S. approves first new nuclear plant in a generation". Reuters.
  19. 1 2 Mark Cooper (18 June 2013). "Nuclear aging: Not so graceful". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists.
  20. 1 2 3 Matthew Wald (June 14, 2013). "Nuclear Plants, Old and Uncompetitive, Are Closing Earlier Than Expected". New York Times.
  21. 1 2 Sylvia Westall and Fredrik Dahl (June 24, 2011). "IAEA Head Sees Wide Support for Stricter Nuclear Plant Safety". Scientific American.[ลิงก์เสีย]
  22. ↑ "Gauging the pressure". The Economist. 28 April 2011.
  23. ↑ European Environment Agency) (Jan 23, 2013). "Late lessons from early warnings: science, precaution, innovation: Full Report". p. 476.
  24. ↑ "Moonshine". Atomicarchive.com. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2013-06-22.
  25. ↑ "The Atomic Solar System". Atomicarchive.com. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2013-06-22.
  26. ↑ taneya says:. "What do you mean by Induced Radioactivity?". Thebigger.com. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2013-06-22.
  27. 1 2 "Neptunium". Vanderkrogt.net. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2013-06-22.
  28. ↑ "Otto Hahn, The Nobel Prize in Chemistry, 1944". http://www.nobelprize.org. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2007-11-01. External link in |publisher= (help)
  29. ↑ "Otto Hahn, Fritz Strassmann, and Lise Meitner". http://www.chemheritage.org. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2007-11-01. External link in |publisher= (help)
  30. ↑ "Otto Robert Frisch". http://www.nuclearfiles.org. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2007-11-01. External link in |publisher= (help)
  31. ↑ "The Einstein Letter". Atomicarchive.com. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2013-06-22.
  32. ↑ John Byrne and Steven M. Hoffman (1996) Governing the Atom: The Politics of Risk, Transaction Publishers, p. 136.
  33. ↑ Benjamin K. Sovacool, The National Politics of Nuclear Power, Routledge, p. 68.
  34. ↑ Bain, Alastair S. (1997). Canada enters the nuclear age: a technical history of Atomic Energy of Canada. Magill-Queen's University Press. p. ix. ISBN 0-7735-1601-8. Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  35. ↑ "Reactors Designed by Argonne National Laboratory: Fast Reactor Technology". U.S. Department of Energy, Argonne National Laboratory. 2012. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2012-07-25.
  36. ↑ "Reactor Makes Electricity." Popular Mechanics, March 1952, p. 105.
  37. ↑ "STR (Submarine Thermal Reactor) in "Reactors Designed by Argonne National Laboratory: Light Water Reactor Technology Development"". U.S. Department of Energy, Argonne National Laboratory. 2012. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2012-07-25.
  38. ↑ Benjamin K. Sovacool. The costs of failure: A preliminary assessment of major energy accidents, 1907–2007, Energy Policy 36 (2008), p. 1808.
  39. ↑ "From Obninsk Beyond: Nuclear Power Conference Looks to Future". International Atomic Energy Agency. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2006-06-27.
  40. ↑ "Nuclear Power in Russia". World Nuclear Association. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2006-06-27.
  41. ↑ "This Day in Quotes: SEPTEMBER 16 - Too cheap to meter: the great nuclear quote debate". This day in quotes. 2009. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2009-09-16.
  42. ↑ Pfau, Richard (1984) No Sacrifice Too Great: The Life of Lewis L. Strauss University Press of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, p. 187, ISBN 978-0-8139-1038-3
  43. ↑ David Bodansky (2004). Nuclear Energy: Principles, Practices, and Prospects. Springer. p. 32. ISBN 978-0-387-20778-0. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2008-01-31.
  44. ↑ Kragh, Helge (1999). Quantum Generations: A History of Physics in the Twentieth Century. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press. p. 286. ISBN 0-691-09552-3.
  45. ↑ "On This Day: October 17". BBC News. 1956-10-17. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2006-11-09.
  46. 1 2 "50 Years of Nuclear Energy" (PDF). International Atomic Energy Agency. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2006-11-09.
  47. 1 2 3 Strengthening the Safety of Radiation Sources p. 14.
  48. 1 2 3 4 Johnston, Robert (September 23, 2007). "Deadliest radiation accidents and other events causing radiation casualties". Database of Radiological Incidents and Related Events.
  49. 1 2 3 4 5 iPad iPhone Android TIME TV Populist The Page (2009-03-25). "The Worst Nuclear Disasters". Time.com. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2013-06-22.
  50. ↑ McKeown, William (2003). Idaho Falls: The Untold Story of America's First Nuclear Accident. Toronto: ECW Press. ISBN 978-1-55022-562-4.
  51. ↑ The Changing Structure of the Electric Power Industry p. 110.
  52. ↑ Bernard L. Cohen. "THE NUCLEAR ENERGY OPTION". Plenum Press. สืบค้นเมื่อ December 2007. Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  53. ↑ Evolution of Electricity Generation by FuelPDF (39.4 KB)
  54. ↑ Sharon Beder, 'The Japanese Situation', English version of conclusion of Sharon Beder, "Power Play: The Fight to Control the World's Electricity", Soshisha, Japan, 2006.
  55. ↑ Paula Garb. Review of Critical Masses, Journal of Political Ecology, Vol 6, 1999.
  56. 1 2 Rüdig, Wolfgang, ed. (1990). Anti-nuclear Movements: A World Survey of Opposition to Nuclear Energy. Detroit, MI: Longman Current Affairs. p. 1. ISBN 0-8103-9000-0.
  57. ↑ Brian Martin. Opposing nuclear power: past and present, Social Alternatives, Vol. 26, No. 2, Second Quarter 2007, pp. 43-47.
  58. ↑ Stephen Mills and Roger Williams (1986). Public Acceptance of New Technologies Routledge, pp. 375-376.
  59. ↑ Robert Gottlieb (2005). Forcing the Spring: The Transformation of the American Environmental Movement, Revised Edition, Island Press, USA, p. 237.
  60. ↑ Jim Falk (1982). Global Fission: The Battle Over Nuclear Power, Oxford University Press, pp. 95-96.
  61. ↑ Walker, J. Samuel (2004). Three Mile Island: A Nuclear Crisis in Historical Perspective (Berkeley: University of California Press), pp. 10-11.
  62. ↑ Herbert P. Kitschelt. Political Opportunity and Political Protest: Anti-Nuclear Movements in Four Democracies British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 16, No. 1, 1986, p. 57.
  63. 1 2 3 Herbert P. Kitschelt. Political Opportunity and Political Protest: Anti-Nuclear Movements in Four Democracies British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 16, No. 1, 1986, p. 71.
  64. ↑ Social Protest and Policy Change p. 45.
  65. ↑ Lutz Mez, Mycle Schneider and Steve Thomas (Eds.) (2009). International Perspectives of Energy Policy and the Role of Nuclear Power, Multi-Science Publishing Co. Ltd, p. 279.
  66. ↑ "The Political Economy of Nuclear Energy in the United States" (PDF). Social Policy. The Brookings Institution. 2004. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2006-11-09.
  67. ↑ Nuclear Power: Outlook for New U.S. Reactors p. 3.
  68. ↑ "Nuclear Follies", a February 11, 1985 cover story in Forbes magazine.
  69. ↑ "Backgrounder on Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant Accident". Nuclear Regulatory Commission. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2006-06-28.
  70. ↑ "RBMK Reactors | reactor bolshoy moshchnosty kanalny | Positive void coefficient". World-nuclear.org. 2009-09-07. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2013-06-14.
  71. ↑ "Italy rejoins the nuclear family". World Nuclear News. 2009-07-10. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2009-07-17.
  72. ↑ "Italy puts one year moratorium on nuclear". 2011-03-13.
  73. ↑ "Italy nuclear: Berlusconi accepts referendum blow". BBC News. 2011-06-14.
  74. 1 2 PMID 17876910 (PubMed)
    Citation will be completed automatically in a few minutes. Jump the queue or expand by hand
  75. 1 2 3 "Dr. MacKay Sustainable Energy without the hot air". Data from studies by the Paul Scherrer Institute including non EU data. p. 168. สืบค้นเมื่อ 15 September 2012.
  76. ↑ http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesconca/2012/06/10/energys-deathprint-a-price-always-paid/ with Chernobyl's total predicted linear no-threshold cancer deaths included, nuclear power is safer when compared to many alternative energy sources' immediate, death rate.
  77. 1 2 Brendan Nicholson (2006-06-05). "Nuclear power 'cheaper, safer' than coal and gas". Melbourne: The Age. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2008-01-18.
  78. 1 2 doi:10.1080/10807030802387556
    This citation will be automatically completed in the next few minutes. You can jump the queue or expand by hand ถ้าคุณไม่สามารถเข้าถึงเอกสารผ่านลิงก์ด้านบน, ลิงก์ต่อไปนี้เปิดให้สาธารณะ, ให้เครดิตผู้เขียนครดิตผู้เขียน. http://gabe.web.psi.ch/pdfs/_2012_LEA_Audit/TA01.pdfหน้า 962 ถึง 965. การเปรียบเทียบการเสียชีวิตจากมะเร็ง แฝงเนื่องจากนิวเคลียร์, กับการเสียชีวิต ทันทีจากมะเร็งเนื่องจากแหล่งพลังงานอื่นต่อหน่วยพลังงานมี่ผลิต (GWeyr). การศึกษานี้ไม่รวมมะเร็งที่เกี่ยวข้องกับเชื้อเพลิงฟอสซิลและการเสียชีวิตทางอ้อมอื่นที่เกิดจากการใช้เชื้อเพลิงฟอสซิลใน"อุบัติเหตุรุนแรง", มีผู้บาดเจ็บสาหัสเกิน 5 ราย.
  79. 1 2 Richard Schiffman (12 March 2013). "Two years on, America hasn't learned lessons of Fukushima nuclear disaster". The Guardian. London.
  80. 1 2 Martin Fackler (June 1, 2011). "Report Finds Japan Underestimated Tsunami Danger". New York Times.
  81. ↑ "Collectively, life cycle assessment literature shows that nuclear power is similar to other renewable and much lower than fossil fuel in total life cycle GHG emissions.''". Nrel.gov. 2013-01-24. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2013-06-22.
  82. ↑ "Prevented Mortality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Historical and Projected Nuclear Power - global nuclear power has prevented an average of 1.84 million air pollution-related deaths and 64 gigatonnes of CO2-equivalent (GtCO2-eq) greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions that would have resulted from fossil fuel burning". Pubs.acs.org. doi:10.1021/es3051197?source=cen.
  83. ↑ "Key World Energy Statistics 2012" (PDF). International Energy Agency. 2012. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2012-12-16.
  84. ↑ "Nuclear Power Plants Information. Number of Reactors Operation Worldwide". International Atomic Energy Agency. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2008-06-21.
  85. ↑ "BP Statistical Review of World Energy June 2012" (PDF). BP. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2012-12-16.
  86. ↑ Trevor Findlay (2010). The Future of Nuclear Energy to 2030 and its Implications for Safety, Security and Nonproliferation: Overview, The Centre for International Governance Innovation (CIGI), Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, pp. 10-11.
  87. ↑ Mycle Schneider, Steve Thomas, Antony Froggatt, and Doug Koplow (August 2009). The World Nuclear Industry Status Report 2009[ลิงก์เสีย] Commissioned by German Federal Ministry of Environment, Nature Conservation and Reactor Safety, p. 5.
  88. 1 2 World Nuclear Association. Another drop in nuclear generation World Nuclear News, 05 May 2010.
  89. ↑ "Summary status for the US". Energy Information Administration. 2010-01-21. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2010-02-18.
  90. ↑ Eleanor Beardsley (2006). "France Presses Ahead with Nuclear Power". NPR. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2006-11-08.
  91. ↑ "Gross electricity generation, by fuel used in power-stations". Eurostat. 2006. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2007-02-03.
  92. ↑ Nuclear Power Generation, US Industry Report" IBISWorld, August 2008
  93. ↑ "Nuclear Icebreaker Lenin". Bellona. 2003-06-20. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2007-11-01.[ลิงก์เสีย]
  94. ↑ David Baurac (2002). "Passively safe reactors rely on nature to keep them cool". Logos (Argonne National Laboratory) 20 (1). Retrieved 2012-07-25.
  95. ↑ "uranium Facts, information, pictures | Encyclopedia.com articles about uranium". Encyclopedia.com. 2001-09-11. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2013-06-14.
  96. ↑ "Second Thoughts About Nuclear Power" (PDF). A Policy Brief - Challenges Facing Asia. January 2011.[ลิงก์เสีย]
  97. ↑ "Uranium resources sufficient to meet projected nuclear energy requirements long into the future". Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA). June 3, 2008. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2008-06-16.
  98. ↑ NEA, IAEA: Uranium 2007 – Resources, Production and Demand. OECD Publishing, June 10, 2008, ISBN 978-92-64-04766-2.
  99. ↑ https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/wg3/ar4-wg3-chapter4.pdf table 4.10 and page 271
  100. ↑ https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/wg3/ar4-wg3-chapter4.pdf figure 4.10 and page 271
  101. ↑ "Uranium 2011 - OECD Online Bookshop". Oecdbookshop.org. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2013-06-14.
  102. ↑ "Global Uranium Supply Ensured For Long Term, New Report Shows". Oecd-nea.org. 2012-07-26. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2013-06-14.
  103. ↑ "Waste Management in the Nuclear Fuel Cycle". Information and Issue Briefs. World Nuclear Association. 2006. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2006-11-09.
  104. ↑ John McCarthy (2006). "Facts From Cohen and Others". Progress and its Sustainability. Stanford. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2006-11-09. Citing Breeder reactors: A renewable energy source, American Journal of Physics, vol. 51, (1), Jan. 1983.
  105. ↑ "Advanced Nuclear Power Reactors". Information and Issue Briefs. World Nuclear Association. 2006. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2006-11-09.
  106. ↑ http://www.worldenergy.org/documents/p001515.pdf
  107. ↑ rebecca kessler. "Are Fast-Breeder Reactors A Nuclear Power Panacea? by Fred Pearce: Yale Environment 360". E360.yale.edu. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2013-06-14.
  108. ↑ "Sodium coolant arrives at Beloyarsk". World-nuclear-news.org. 2013-01-24. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2013-06-14.
  109. ↑ "Large fast reactor approved for Beloyarsk". World-nuclear-news.org. 2012-06-27. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2013-06-14.
  110. ↑ "Atomic agency plans to restart Monju prototype fast breeder reactor - AJW by The Asahi Shimbun". Ajw.asahi.com. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2013-06-14.
  111. ↑ "India's breeder reactor to be commissioned in 2013". Hindustan Times. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2013-06-14.
  112. ↑ "China makes nuclear power development - Xinhua | English.news.cn". News.xinhuanet.com. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2013-06-14.
  113. ↑ "Thorium". Information and Issue Briefs. World Nuclear Association. 2006. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2006-11-09.
  114. ↑ M. I. Ojovan, W.E. Lee. An Introduction to Nuclear Waste Immobilisation, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam, 315pp. (2005).
  115. ↑ "NRC: Dry Cask Storage". Nrc.gov. 2013-03-26. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2013-06-22.
  116. ↑ "Yankee Nuclear Power Plant". Yankeerowe.com. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2013-06-22.
  117. ↑ "Environmental Surveillance, Education and Research Program". Idaho National Laboratory. Archived from the original on 2008-11-21. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2009-01-05.
  118. ↑ Vandenbosch 2007, p. 21.
  119. ↑ Ojovan, M. I.; Lee, W.E. (2005). An Introduction to Nuclear Waste Immobilisation. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers. p. 315. ISBN 0-08-044462-8.CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list (link)
  120. ↑ Brown, Paul (2004-04-14). "Shoot it at the sun. Send it to Earth's core. What to do with nuclear waste?". The Guardian. London.
  121. ↑ National Research Council (1995). Technical Bases for Yucca Mountain Standards. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. p. 91. ISBN 0-309-05289-0.
  122. ↑ "The Status of Nuclear Waste Disposal". The American Physical Society. January 2006. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2008-06-06.
  123. ↑ "Public Health and Environmental Radiation Protection Standards for Yucca Mountain, Nevada; Proposed Rule" (PDF). United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2005-08-22. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2008-06-06.
  124. ↑ การแปรธาตุ, การเปลี่ยนจากธาตุหนึ่งเป็นอีกธาตุหนึ่ง โดยการเปลี่ยนจำนวนโปรตอนภายในนิวเคลียสของอะตอมด้วยปฏิกิริยานิวเคลียร์ เช่น การแปรธาตุโคบอลต์-60 เป็นนิกเกิล-60 [นิวเคลียร์], อังกฤษ-ไทย: คลังศัพท์ไทย โดย สวทช.
  125. ↑ Duncan Clark (2012-07-09). "Nuclear waste-burning reactor moves a step closer to reality | Environment | guardian.co.uk". London: Guardian. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2013-06-14.
  126. ↑ "George Monbiot – A Waste of Waste". Monbiot.com. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2013-06-14.
  127. ↑ "Energy From Thorium: A Nuclear Waste Burning Liquid Salt Thorium Reactor". YouTube. 2009-07-23. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2013-06-14.
  128. ↑ NWT magazine, oktober 2012
  129. ↑ Sevior M. (2006). "Considerations for nuclear power in Australia" (PDF). International Journal of Environmental Studies. 63 (6): 859–872. doi:10.1080/00207230601047255.
  130. ↑ Thorium Resources In Rare Earth Elements
  131. ↑ American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2007, abstract #V33A-1161. Mass and Composition of the Continental Crust
  132. ↑ Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 23:193-203;1998. Dr. Bernard L. Cohen, University of Pittsburgh. Perspectives on the High Level Waste Disposal Problem
  133. ↑ "Waste Management in the Nuclear Fuel Cycle". Information and Issue Briefs. World Nuclear Association. 2006. Retrieved 2006-11-09.
  134. ↑ "The Challenges of Nuclear Power".
  135. ↑ "Coal Ash Is More Radioactive than Nuclear Waste". December 13, 2007.
  136. ↑ Alex Gabbard (February 5, 2008). "Coal Combustion: Nuclear Resource or Danger". Oak Ridge National Laboratory. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2008-01-31.
  137. ↑ "Coal ash is not more radioactive than nuclear waste". CE Journal. 2008-12-31.
  138. 1 2 Montgomery, Scott L. (2010). The Powers That Be, University of Chicago Press, p. 137.
  139. 1 2 Al Gore (2009). Our Choice, Bloomsbury, pp. 165-166.
  140. ↑ "international Journal of Environmental Studies, The Solutions for Nuclear waste, December 2005" (PDF). สืบค้นเมื่อ 2013-06-22.
  141. ↑ "Oklo: Natural Nuclear Reactors". U.S. Department of Energy Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, Yucca Mountain Project, DOE/YMP-0010. November 2004. Archived from the original on August 25, 2009. สืบค้นเมื่อ September 15, 2009.
  142. ↑ "A Nuclear Power Renaissance?". Scientific American. April 28, 2008. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2008-05-15.
  143. ↑ von Hippel, Frank N. (April 2008). "Nuclear Fuel Recycling: More Trouble Than It's Worth". Scientific American. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2008-05-15.
  144. ↑ Is the Nuclear Renaissance Fizzling?
  145. ↑ IEEE Spectrum: Nuclear Wasteland. Retrieved on 2007-04-22
  146. ↑ "Nuclear Fuel Reprocessing: U.S. Policy Development" (PDF). สืบค้นเมื่อ 2009-07-25.
  147. ↑ "Adieu to nuclear recycling". Nature. 460 (7252): 152. 2009. doi:10.1038/460152b.
  148. ↑ Processing of Used Nuclear Fuel for Recycle. WNA
  149. ↑ Hambling, David (July 30, 2003). "'Safe' alternative to depleted uranium revealed". New Scientist. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2008-07-16.
  150. ↑ Stevens, J. B. "Adiabatic Shear Banding in Axisymmetric Impact and Penetration Problems". Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2008-07-16. Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  151. 1 2 John Quiggin (8 November 2013). "Reviving nuclear power debates is a distraction. We need to use less energy". The Guardian.
  152. 1 2 3 Kidd, Steve (January 21, 2011). "New reactors—more or less?". Nuclear Engineering International.
  153. ↑ Ed Crooks (12 September 2010). "Nuclear: New dawn now seems limited to the east". Financial Times. สืบค้นเมื่อ 12 September 2010.
  154. ↑ United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1983. The Price-Anderson Act: the Third Decade, NUREG-0957
  155. ↑ The Future of Nuclear Power. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 2003. ISBN 0-615-12420-8. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2006-11-10.
  156. ↑ Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2011). "The Future of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle" (PDF). p. xv.
  157. ↑ Tomoko Yamazaki and Shunichi Ozasa (June 27, 2011). "Fukushima Retiree Leads Anti-Nuclear Shareholders at Tepco Annual Meeting". Bloomberg.
  158. ↑ Mari Saito (May 7, 2011). "Japan anti-nuclear protesters rally after PM call to close plant". Reuters.
  159. 1 2 Benjamin K. Sovacool. A Critical Evaluation of Nuclear Power and Renewable Electricity in Asia Journal of Contemporary Asia, Vol. 40, No. 3, August 2010, pp. 393–400.
  160. ↑ Benjamin K. Sovacool (2009). The Accidental Century - Prominent Energy Accidents in the Last 100 Years[ลิงก์เสีย]
  161. ↑ David Baurac (2002). "Passively safe reactors rely on nature to keep them cool". Logos. Argonne National Laboratory. 20 (1). สืบค้นเมื่อ 2012-07-25.
  162. ↑ http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesconca/2012/06/10/energys-deathprint-a-price-always-paid/ with and without Chernobyl's total predicted, by the Linear no-threshold, cancer deaths included.
  163. ↑ PMID 17876910 (PubMed)
    Citation will be completed automatically in a few minutes. Jump the queue or expand by hand - Nuclear power has lower electricity related health risks than Coal, Oil, & gas. ...the health burdens are appreciably smaller for generation from natural gas, and lower still for nuclear power. This study includes the latent or indirect fatalities, for example those caused by the inhalation of fossil fuel created particulate matter, smog induced Cardiopulmonary events, black lung etc. in its comparison.)
  164. ↑ "Nuclear Power Prevents More Deaths Than It Causes | Chemical & Engineering News". Cen.acs.org. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2014-01-24.
  165. ↑ doi:10.1021/es3051197
    This citation will be automatically completed in the next few minutes. You can jump the queue or expand by hand
  166. ↑ doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2008.01.040
    This citation will be automatically completed in the next few minutes. You can jump the queue or expand by hand
  167. ↑ doi:10.1080/10807030802387556
    This citation will be automatically completed in the next few minutes. You can jump the queue or expand by hand
  168. ↑ Dennis Normile (27 July 2012). "Is Nuclear Power Good for You?". Science. 337 (6093): 395. doi:10.1126/science.337.6093.395-b.
  169. ↑ Andrew C. Revkin (March 10, 2012). "Nuclear Risk and Fear, from Hiroshima to Fukushima". New York Times.
  170. ↑ Frank N. von Hippel (September–October 2011). "The radiological and psychological consequences of the Fukushima Daiichi accident". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 67 (5): 27–36. doi:10.1177/0096340211421588.
  171. 1 2 Steven E. Miller & Scott D. Sagan (Fall 2009). "Nuclear power without nuclear proliferation?". Dædalus. 138 (4): 7. doi:10.1162/daed.2009.138.4.7.
  172. 1 2 3 "The Bulletin of atomic scientists support the megatons to megawatts program". สืบค้นเมื่อ 15 September 2012.
  173. ↑ "home". usec.com. 2013-05-24. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2013-06-14.
  174. 1 2 Benjamin K. Sovacool (2011). Contesting the Future of Nuclear Power: A Critical Global Assessment of Atomic Energy, World Scientific, p. 190.
  175. ↑ All Things Considered (2009-12-05). "Future Unclear For 'Megatons To Megawatts' Program". Npr.org. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2013-06-22.
  176. ↑ "Megatons to Megawatts Eliminates Equivalent of 10,000 Nuclear Warheads". Usec.com. 2005-09-21. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2013-06-22.
  177. ↑ "Nuclear Power in the World Today". World-nuclear.org. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2013-06-22.
  178. ↑ Mark Diesendorf (2013). "Book review: Contesting the future of nuclear power" (PDF). Energy Policy.
  179. 1 2 Benjamin K. Sovacool. Valuing the greenhouse gas emissions from nuclear power: A critical survey. Energy Policy, Vol. 36, 2008, p. 2950.
  180. ↑ doi:10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00472.x
    This citation will be automatically completed in the next few minutes. You can jump the queue or expand by hand
  181. ↑ "Energy Balances and CO2 Implications". World Nuclear Association. November 2005. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2014-01-24.
  182. ↑ "Life-cycle emissions analyses". Nei.org. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2010-08-24.
  183. 1 2 3 "UNSCEAR 2008 Report to the General Assembly" (PDF). United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. 2008.
  184. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Dr. Frauke Urban and Dr. Tom Mitchell 2011. Climate change, disasters and electricity generation. London: Overseas Development Institute and Institute of Development Studies
  185. 1 2 Benjamin K. Sovacool (2011). Contesting the Future of Nuclear Power: A Critical Global Assessment of Atomic Energy, World Scientific, p. 118-119.
  186. ↑ "Nuclear decommissioning costs exceed £73bn".
  187. ↑ Walker, J. Samuel (2004). Three Mile Island: A Nuclear Crisis in Historical Perspective (Berkeley: University of California Press), pp. 10-11
  188. ↑ Herbert P. Kitschelt. Political Opportunity and Political Protest: Anti-Nuclear Movements in Four Democracies British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 16, No. 1, 1986, p. 57.
  189. ↑ Jim Falk (1982). Global Fission: The Battle Over Nuclear Power, Oxford University Press.
  190. ↑ Patterson, Thom (November 3, 2013). "Climate change warriors: It's time to go nuclear". CNN.
  191. ↑ "Renewable Energy and Electricity". World Nuclear Association. June 2010. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2010-07-04.
  192. ↑ M. King Hubbert (June 1956). "Nuclear Energy and the Fossil Fuels 'Drilling and Production Practice'" (PDF). API. p. 36. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2008-04-18.
  193. ↑ Bernard Cohen. "The Nuclear Energy Option". สืบค้นเมื่อ 2009-12-09.
  194. ↑ Greenpeace International and European Renewable Energy Council (January 2007). Energy Revolution: A Sustainable World Energy Outlook, p. 7.
  195. ↑ Giugni, Marco (2004). Social Protest and Policy Change: Ecology, Antinuclear, and Peace Movements.
  196. ↑ Benjamin K. Sovacool. The costs of failure: A preliminary assessment of major energy accidents, 1907–2007, Energy Policy 36 (2008), pp. 1802-1820.
  197. ↑ Stephanie Cooke (2009). In Mortal Hands: A Cautionary History of the Nuclear Age, Black Inc., p. 280.
  198. ↑ Kurt Kleiner. Nuclear energy: assessing the emissions Nature Reports, Vol. 2, October 2008, pp. 130-131.
  199. ↑ Mark Diesendorf (2007). Greenhouse Solutions with Sustainable Energy, University of New South Wales Press, p. 252.
  200. ↑ Mark Diesendorf. Is nuclear energy a possible solution to global warming?[ลิงก์เสีย]
  201. ↑ World Nuclear Association (September 2013). "Renewable Energy and Electricity".
  202. ↑ Kloor, Keith (11 January 2013). "The Pro-Nukes Environmental Movement". Slate.com "The Big Questions" Blog. The Slate Group. สืบค้นเมื่อ 11 March 2013.
  203. ↑ Smil, Vaclav (2012-06-28). "A Skeptic Looks at Alternative Energy - IEEE Spectrum". Spectrum.ieee.org. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2014-01-24.
  204. ↑ International Energy Agency (2007). Contribution of Renewables to Energy Security IEA Information Paper, p. 5.
  205. ↑ Amory Lovins (2011). Reinventing Fire, Chelsea Green Publishing, p. 199.
  206. ↑ Entwicklungen in der deutschen Strom- und Gaswirtschaft 2012[ลิงก์เสีย] BDEW (german)
  207. ↑ Harvey, Fiona (2012-10-30). "Renewable energy will overtake nuclear power by 2018, research says". The Guardian. London.
  208. ↑ Steve Colquhoun (2012-10-31). "Scotland aims for 100% renewable energy by 2020". Smh.com.au. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2014-01-24.
  209. 1 2 Fiona Harvey (9 May 2011). "Renewable energy can power the world, says landmark IPCC study". The Guardian. London.
  210. ↑ [ลิงก์เสีย]
  211. ↑ "Is solar power cheaper than nuclear power?". August 9, 2010. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2013-01-04.
  212. ↑ "Solar and Nuclear Costs — The Historic Crossover" (PDF). July 2010. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2013-01-16.
  213. ↑ "Solar and Nuclear Costs — The Historic Crossover". July 2010. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2013-01-16.
  214. ↑ Chris Namovicz, Assessing the Economic Value of New Utility-Scale Renewable Generation Projects US Energy Information Administration Energy Conference, 17 June 2013.
  215. ↑ Nils Starfelt; Carl-Erik Wikdahl. "Economic Analysis of Various Options of Electricity Generation - Taking into Account Health and Environmental Effects" (PDF). สืบค้นเมื่อ 2012-09-08.
  216. ↑ David Biello (2009-01-28). "Spent Nuclear Fuel: A Trash Heap Deadly for 250,000 Years or a Renewable Energy Source?". Scientificamerican.com. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2014-01-24.
  217. ↑ "Closing and Decommissioning Nuclear Power Plants" (PDF). March 7, 2012.
  218. ↑ "Olkiluoto pipe welding 'deficient', says regulator". World Nuclear News. 16 October 2009. สืบค้นเมื่อ 8 June 2010.
  219. ↑ Kinnunen, Terhi (2010-07-01). "Finnish parliament agrees plans for two reactors". Reuters. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2010-07-02.
  220. ↑ "Olkiluoto 3 delayed beyond 2014". World Nuclear News. 17 July 2012. สืบค้นเมื่อ 24 July 2012.
  221. ↑ "Finland's Olkiluoto 3 nuclear plant delayed again". BBC. 16 July 2012. สืบค้นเมื่อ 10 August 2012.
  222. ↑ http://www.iaea.org/PRIS/WorldStatistics/WorldTrendinElectricalProduction.aspx International Atomic Energy Agency, March 2014]]
  223. ↑ "The Nuclear Renaissance". World Nuclear Association. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2014-01-24.
  224. 1 2 WNA (20 June 2013). "Nuclear power down in 2012". World Nuclear News.
  225. ↑ Nuclear Renaissance Threatened as Japan’s Reactor Struggles Bloomberg, published March 2011, accessed 2011-03-14
  226. ↑ Analysis: Nuclear renaissance could fizzle after Japan quake Reuters, published 2011-03-14, accessed 2011-03-14
  227. ↑ Japan nuclear woes cast shadow over U.S. energy policy Reuters, published 2011-03-13, accessed 2011-03-14
  228. ↑ Nuclear winter? Quake casts new shadow on reactors MarketWatch, published 2011-03-14, accessed 2011-03-14
  229. ↑ Will China's nuclear nerves fuel a boom in green energy? Channel 4, published 2011-03-17, accessed 2011-03-17
  230. ↑ "NEWS ANALYSIS: Japan crisis puts global nuclear expansion in doubt". Platts. 21 March 2011.
  231. ↑ "Siemens to quit nuclear industry". BBC News. September 18, 2011.
  232. ↑ "Italy announces nuclear moratorium". World Nuclear News. 24 March 2011. สืบค้นเมื่อ 23 May 2011.
  233. ↑ Jo Chandler (March 19, 2011). "Is this the end of the nuclear revival?". The Sydney Morning Herald.
  234. ↑ Aubrey Belford (March 17, 2011). "Indonesia to Continue Plans for Nuclear Power". New York Times.
  235. ↑ Israel Prime Minister Netanyahu: Japan situation has "caused me to reconsider" nuclear power Piers Morgan on CNN, published 2011-03-17, accessed 2011-03-17
  236. ↑ Israeli PM cancels plan to build nuclear plant xinhuanet.com, published 2011-03-18, accessed 2011-03-17
  237. ↑ "Gauging the pressure". The Economist. 28 April 2011.
  238. ↑ "Bruce Power's Unit 2 sends electricity to Ontario grid for first time in 17 years". Bruce Power. 2012-10-16. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2014-01-24.
  239. ↑ "Nuclear Follies", a February 11, 1985 cover story in Forbes magazine.
  240. ↑ James Kanter. In Finland, Nuclear Renaissance Runs Into Trouble New York Times, May 28, 2009.
  241. ↑ James Kanter. Is the Nuclear Renaissance Fizzling? Green, 29 May 2009.
  242. ↑ Rob Broomby. Nuclear dawn delayed in Finland BBC News, 8 July 2009.
  243. 1 2 3 4 Jeff McMahon (10 November 2013). "New-Build Nuclear Is Dead: Morningstar". Forbes.
  244. 1 2 Hannah Northey (18 March 2011). "Former NRC Member Says Renaissance is Dead, for Now". New York Times.
  245. ↑ Ian Lowe (March 20, 2011). "No nukes now, or ever". The Age. Melbourne.
  246. ↑ Leo Hickman (28 November 2012). "Nuclear lobbyists wined and dined senior civil servants, documents show". The Guardian. London.
  247. ↑ Diane Farseta (September 1, 2008). "The Campaign to Sell Nuclear". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. pp. 38–56.
  248. ↑ Jonathan Leake. " The Nuclear Charm Offensive" New Statesman, 23 May 2005.
  249. ↑ Union of Concerned Scientists. Nuclear Industry Spent Hundreds of Millions of Dollars Over the Last Decade to Sell Public, Congress on New Reactors, New Investigation Finds[ลิงก์เสีย] News Center, February 1, 2010.
  250. ↑ Nuclear group spent $460,000 lobbying in 4Q Business Week, March 19, 2010.
  251. ↑ World Nuclear Association (December 10, 2010). Nuclear Power in China
  252. ↑ China is Building the World’s Largest Nuclear Capacity 21cbh.com, 21. Sep. 2010
  253. ↑ "China Should Control Pace of Reactor Construction, Outlook Says". Bloomberg News. January 11, 2011.
  254. 1 2 "Nuclear Power in the USA". World Nuclear Association. June 2008. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2008-07-25.
  255. ↑ Matthew L. Wald (December 7, 2010). Nuclear ‘Renaissance’ Is Short on Largess The New York Times.
  256. ↑ "NRC/DOE Life After 60 Workshop Report" (PDF). 2008. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2009-04-01.[ลิงก์เสีย]
  257. ↑ New nuclear build – sufficient supply capability? Steve Kid, Nuclear Engineering International, 3/3/2009
  258. ↑ Bloomberg exclusive: Samurai-Sword Maker's Reactor Monopoly May Cool Nuclear Revival By Yoshifumi Takemoto and Alan Katz, bloomberg.com, 3/13/08.
  259. ↑ Plans For New Reactors Worldwide, World Nuclear Association
  260. ↑ "Nuclear Energy's Role in Responding to the Energy Challenges of the 21st Century" (PDF). Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2008-06-21.
  261. 1 2 "Nuclear power: When the steam clears". The Economist. March 24, 2011.
  262. ↑ Paton J (April 4, 2011). "Fukushima crisis worse for atomic power than Chernobyl, USB says". Bloomberg.com. Missing or empty |url= (help)
  263. ↑ Deutsche Bank Group (2011). The 2011 inflection point for energymarkets: Health, safety, security and the environment. DB Climate Change Advisors, May 2.
  264. ↑ John Broder (October 10, 2011). "The Year of Peril and Promise in Energy Production". New York Times.
  265. ↑ "Siemens to quit nuclear industry". BBC News. 18 September 2011.
  266. ↑ "IAEA sees slow nuclear growth post Japan". UPI. September 23, 2011.
  267. 1 2 Hsu, Jeremy (February 9, 2012). "First Next-Gen US Reactor Designed to Avoid Fukushima Repeat". Live Science (hosted on Yahoo!). สืบค้นเมื่อ February 9, 2012.
  268. ↑ Kristi E. Swartz (February 16, 2012). "Groups sue to stop Vogtle expansion project". The Atlanta Journal-Constitution.
  269. ↑ Duroyan Fertl (June 5, 2011). "Germany: Nuclear power to be phased out by 2022". Green Left.
  270. ↑ "Science/Nature | France gets nuclear fusion plant". BBC News. 2005-06-28. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2014-01-24.
  271. ↑ "NCPST Homepage | DCU". Ncpst.ie. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2014-01-24.
  272. ↑ Renewables 2012 Global Status Report p. 21
  273. ↑ "4th Generation Nuclear Power — OSS Foundation". Ossfoundation.us. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2014-01-24.
  274. 1 2 Adam Piore (June 2011). "Nuclear energy: Planning for the Black Swan". Scientific American. Missing or empty |url= (help)
  275. ↑ Matthew L. Wald. Critics Challenge Safety of New Reactor Design New York Times, April 22, 2010.
  276. ↑ "Nuclear Power in a Warming World" (PDF). Union of Concerned Scientists. สืบค้นเมื่อ 1 October 2008.
  277. 1 2 Benjamin K. Sovacool. A Critical Evaluation of Nuclear Power and Renewable Electricity in Asia, Journal of Contemporary Asia, Vol. 40, No. 3, August 2010, p. 381.
  278. ↑ Gerstner, E. (2009). "Nuclear energy: The hybrid returns" (PDF). Nature. 460 (7251): 25–8. doi:10.1038/460025a. PMID 19571861.
  279. ↑ Introduction to Fusion Energy, J. Reece Roth, 1986.[ต้องการหน้า]
  280. ↑ T. Hamacher and A.M. Bradshaw (October 2001). "Fusion as a Future Power Source: Recent Achievements and Prospects" (PDF). World Energy Council. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2004-05-06.
  281. ↑ W Wayt Gibbs (30 December 2013). "Triple-threat method sparks hope for fusion". Nature.
  282. ↑ "Overview of EFDA Activities". EFDA. European Fusion Development Agreement. Archived from the original on 2006-10-01. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2006-11-11.
  283. ↑ "About Friends of the Earth International". Friends of the Earth International. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2009-06-25.
  284. ↑ "United Nations, Department of Public Information, Non-Governmental Organizations". Un.org. 2006-02-23. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2010-08-24.
บทความเกี่ยวกับวิทยาศาสตร์นี้ยังเป็นโครง คุณสามารถช่วยวิกิพีเดียได้โดยเพิ่มข้อมูล ดูเพิ่มที่ สถานีย่อย:วิทยาศาสตร์

แหล่งที่มา

WikiPedia: พลังงานนิวเคลียร์ http://books.google.com.au/books?hl=en&id=SeMNAAAA... http://books.google.com.au/books?id=C5W8uxwMqdUC&p... http://books.google.com.au/books?id=Kn6YhNtyVigC&p... http://books.google.com.au/books?id=lR0n6oqMNPkC&d... http://books.google.com.au/books?id=tf0AfoynG-EC&d... http://www.smh.com.au/business/carbon-economy/scot... http://www.smh.com.au/world/is-this-the-end-of-the... http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/nuclear-pow... http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/politics/no-nukes... http://www.uic.com.au/reactors.htm