1 2 Goldreich, Daniel; Tong, Jonathan (2013). "Prediction, Postdiction, and Perceptual Length Contraction: A Bayesian Low-Speed Prior Captures the Cutaneous Rabbit and Related Illusions". Frontiers in Psychology. 4. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00221.
↑ Geldard, Frank A. (1982). "Saltation in somesthesis". Psychological Bulletin. 92 (1): 136–175. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.92.1.136.
↑ Khuu, S. K.; Kidd, J. C.; Badcock, D. R. (2011-08-15). "The influence of spatial orientation on the perceived path of visual saltatory motion". Journal of Vision. 11 (9): 5–5. doi:10.1167/11.9.5.
↑ Getzmann, Stephan (2009). "Exploring auditory saltation using the "reduced-rabbit" paradigm". Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 35 (1): 289–304. doi:10.1037/a0013026.
1 2 Goldreich, Daniel (2007-03-28). "A Bayesian Perceptual Model Replicates the Cutaneous Rabbit and Other Tactile Spatiotemporal Illusions". PLoS ONE. 2 (3): e333. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000333.
1 2 Tong, Jonathan; Ngo, Vy; Goldreich, Daniel (2016-08-01). "Tactile length contraction as Bayesian inference". Journal of Neurophysiology. 116 (2): 369–379. doi:10.1152/jn.00029.2016.
↑ Bill, JC; Teft, LW (1972-11). "Space-time relations: the effects of variations in stimulus and interstimulus interval duration on perceived visual extent". Acta psychologica. 36 (5): 358–69. PMID4644729. Check date values in: |date= (help)
1 2 Sarrazin, Jean-Christophe; Giraudo, Marie-Dominique; Pittenger, John Bruce (2005-10-07). "Tau and Kappa effects in physical space: the case of audition". Psychological Research. 71 (2): 201–218. doi:10.1007/s00426-005-0019-1.
↑ Chen, Youguo; Zhang, Bangwu; Kording, Konrad Paul; Luo, Wenbo (2016-04-21). "Speed Constancy or Only Slowness: What Drives the Kappa Effect". PLOS ONE. 11 (4): e0154013. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0154013.
↑ Ogata, Katsuya; Kuroda, Tsuyoshi; Miyazaki, Makoto; Grondin, Simon; Tobimatsu, Shozo (2016-10-31). "The Kappa Effect With Only Two Visual Markers". Multisensory Research. 29 (8): 703–725. doi:10.1163/22134808-00002533.
↑ Brugger, Peter; Meier, Rebekka (2015-01). "A New Illusion at Your Elbow". Perception. 44 (2): 219–221. doi:10.1068/p7910. Check date values in: |date= (help)
↑ Robles-De-La-Torre, Gabriel. "Haptic Perception of Shape: touch illusions, forces and the geometry of objects". Archived from the original on 2012-09-29. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2012-11-15. 3.2 The paradoxical object scenario: forces and geometry vary in an "impossible" manner. When the haptic interface is powered on, it generates computer-controlled forces. Such forces are added to the forces that arise naturally from the normal tool-surface interaction. In this manner, it is feasible to create normally impossible, paradoxical objects in which geometrical information conflicts with force information. Figure 1 presents one of these impossible objects. Here, a person is exploring and object with a real, physical hole object (Figure 1, gray bar). Normally, the person would simultaneously experience forces that are related to the geometry of the hole, as in the normal case described before. However, in this impossible object, the haptic interface modifies such forces, so that the person experiences forces that are normally associated with an object that has a bump on it (Figure 1, red dotted line). Here the bump is purely virtual: it is created with forces, and has no geometrical information of its own. That is, when exploring this object, the person's fingertip still follows the hole trajectory given by the plastic surface (gray bar in Figure 1). The end result is that the person experiences the geometrical information of a hole, together with the force information of a bump.
