อ้างอิง ของ จิตรกรรมยุคทองของเนเธอร์แลนด์

  1. Lloyd, 15, citing Jonathan Israel. Perhaps only 1% survive today, and "only about 10% of these were of real quality".
  2. Jan Steen was an innkeeper, Aelbert Cuyp was one of many whose wealthy wives pursuaded them to give up painting, although Karel Dujardin seems to have run away from his to continue his work. See their biographies in MacLaren. The fish artist Jacob Gillig also worked as a warder in the Utrecht prison, conveniently close to the fish market.. Bankrupts included: Rembrandt, Frans Hals, Jan de Bray, and many others.
  3. Franits, 217 and ff. on 1672 and its effects.
  4. Fuchs, 43
  5. Prak, 241
  6. Lloyd, 97
  7. Fuchs, 43
  8. Franits' book is largely organized by city and by period; Slive by subject categories
  9. Fuchs, 76
  10. See Slive, 296-7 and elsewhere
  11. Fuchs, 107
  12. Fuchs, 62, R.H. Wilenski, Dutch Painting, "Prologue" pp. 27-43, 1945, Faber, London
  13. Fuchs, 62-3
  14. Fuchs, 43
  15. Slive, 13-14
  16. Fuchs, 62-69
  17. Franits, 65. Catholic 17th century Dutch artists included Abraham Bloemaert and Gerard van Honthorst from Utrecht, and Jan Steen, Paulus Bor, Jacob van Velsen, plus Vermeer who probably converted at his marriage. Jacob Jordaens was among Flemish Protestant artists.
  18. Slive, 22-4
  19. Fuchs, 69-77
  20. Fuchs, 77-78
  21. Trip family tree. Her grandparents' various portraits by Rembrandt are famous.
  22. Ekkart, 17 n.1 (on p. 228).
  23. Shawe-Taylor, 22-23, 32-33 on portraits, quotation from 33
  24. Ekkart, 118
  25. Ekkart, 130 and 114.
  26. Ekkart (Marike de Winkel essay), 68-69
  27. Ekkart (Marike de Winkel essay), 66-68
  28. Ekkart (Marike de Winkel essay), 69-71
  29. Another version at Apsley House, with a different composition, but using most of the same moralizing objects, is analysed by Franits, 206-9
  30. Fuchs, 42 and Slive, 123
  31. Slive, 123
  32. Franits, 1, mentioning costume in works by the Utrecht Caravagggisti, and architectural settings, as especially prone to abandon accurate depiction.
  33. Franits, 4-6 summarizes the debate, for which Svetlana Alpers' The Art of Describing (1983) is an important work (though see Slive's terse comment on p. 344). See also Franits, 20-21 on paintings being understood differently by contemporary individuals, and his p.24
  34. On Diderot's Art Criticism. Mira Friedman.p. 36
  35. Fuchs, 39-42, analyses two comparable scenes by Steen and Dou, and p. 46.
  36. Franits, 180-182, though he strangely seems to discount the possibility that the couple are married. Married or not, the hunter clearly hopes for a return from his gift of (punning) birds, though the open shoe and gun on the floor, pointing in different directions, suggest he may be disappointed. Metsu used opposed dogs several times, and may have invented the motif, which was copied by Victorian artists. A statue of Cupid presides over the scene.
  37. Fuchs, pp 54, 44, 45.
  38. Slive, 191
  39. Explored at length by Schama in his Chapter 6. See also the analysis of "The Milkmaid (Vermeer)", claimed by different art historians for each tradition.
  40. Franits, 24-27
  41. Franits, 34-43. Presumably these are intended to imply houses abandoned by Catholic gentry who had fled south in the Eighty Years War. His self-portrait shows him, equally implausibly, working in just such a setting.
  42. Fuchs, 80
  43. Slive, 189 – the study is by H.-U. Beck (1991)
  44. Slive, 190 (quote), 195-202
  45. Derived from works by Allart van Everdingen who, unlike Ruysdael, had visited Norway, in 1644. Slive, 203
  46. Slive, 225
  47. Rembrandt owned seven Seghers; after a recent fire only 11 are now thought to survive – how many of Rembrandt's remain is unclear.
  48. Slive, 268-273
  49. Slive, 273-6
  50. Slive, 213-216
  51. MacLaren, 79
  52. Slive, 279-281. Fuchs, 109
  53. Fuchs, 113-6
  54. and only a few others, see Slive, 128, 320-321 and index, and Schama, 414. The outstanding woman artist of the age was Judith Leyster.
  55. Fuchs, 111-112. Slive, 279-281, also covering unseasonal and recurring blooms.
  56. Slive, 287-291
  57. Slive, 212
  58. See Reitlinger, 11-15, 23-4, and passim, and listings for individual artists
  59. See Reitlinger, 483-4, and passim
  60. Slive, 319
  61. Slive, 191-2
  62. Slive, 144 (Vermeer), 41-2 (Hals), 173 (Steen)
  63. Slive, 158-160 (coin quote), and Fuchs, 147-8, who uses the title Brothel Scene. Franits, 146-7, citing Alison Kettering, says there is "deliberate vagueness" as to the subject, and still uses the title Paternal Admonition.
  64. Reitlinger, I, 11-15. Quote p.13
  65. Slive, 225
  66. Franits, 164-6.
  67. MacLaren, 227
  68. Franits, 152-6. Schama, 455-460 discusses the general preoccupation with maidservants, "the most dangerous women of all" (p. 455). See also Franits, 118-119 and 166 on servants.

ใกล้เคียง

จิตรกรรมสมัยฟื้นฟูศิลปวิทยาในอิตาลี จิตรกรรมฝาผนัง จิตรกรรมยุคทองของเนเธอร์แลนด์ จิตรกรรมบารอกแบบเฟลมิช จิตรกรรม จิตรกรรมไทยประเพณี จิตรกรรมเนเธอร์แลนด์เริ่มแรก จิตรกรรมแผง จิตรกรรมภูมิทัศน์ จิตรกรรมไทย