อ้างอิง ของ ระบบการลงคะแนนแบบคะแนนรวม

  1. ↑ "Center for Range Voting - front page". RangeVoting.org. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2016-12-11. score voting (also known as "range voting").
  2. ↑ "Score Voting". The Center for Election Science. 2015-05-21. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2016-12-11.
  3. ↑ "Social Choice and Beyond - Range Voting". socialchoiceandbeyond.com. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2016-12-10. with the winner being the one with the largest point total. Or, alternatively, the average may be computed and the one with the highest average wins
  4. ↑ "Score Voting". The Center for Election Science. 2015-05-21. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2016-12-10. Simplified forms of score voting automatically give skipped candidates the lowest possible score for the ballot they were skipped. Other forms have those ballots not affect the candidate's rating at all. Those forms not affecting the candidates rating frequently make use of quotas. Quotas demand a minimum proportion of voters rate that candidate in some way before that candidate is eligible to win.
  5. 1 2 Baujard, Antoinette; Igersheim, Herrade; Lebon, Isabelle; Gavrel, Frédéric; Laslier, Jean-François (2014-06-01). "Who's favored by evaluative voting? An experiment conducted during the 2012 French presidential election" (PDF). Electoral Studies. 34: 131–145. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2013.11.003. voting rules in which the voter freely grades each candidate on a pre-defined numerical scale. .. also called utilitarian voting
  6. ↑ Joslyn, Richard A. (1976). "The impact of decision rules in multi-candidate campaigns: The case of the 1972 democratic presidential nomination". Public Choice (ภาษาอังกฤษ). 25 (1): 1–17. doi:10.1007/BF01726327. ISSN 0048-5829.
  7. ↑ James S. Fishkin: The Voice of the People: Public Opinion & Democracy, Yale University Press 1995
  8. ↑ "Ancient Sparta used score voting... sort of".
  9. ↑ Girard, C. (2010). "Acclamation voting in Sparta: An early use of approval voting". ใน Laslier, Jean-François; Sanver, M. Remzi (บ.ก.). Handbook on Approval Voting. Studies in Choice and Welfare (ภาษาอังกฤษ). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. pp. 15–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-02839-7_3. ISBN 9783642028380.
  10. ↑ Stille, Alexander (2001-06-02). "Adding Up the Costs of Cyberdemocracy". New York Times. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2009-10-03.
  11. ↑ "Venetian Doges & Government". RangeVoting.org. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2018-07-14.
  12. ↑ "Utah Green Party Hosts Dr. Stein; Elects New Officers". Independent Political Report (ภาษาอังกฤษ). 2017-06-27. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2017-09-14. Using the following Range Voting System, the Green Party of Utah elected a new slate of officers
  13. ↑ "Rating Scale Research". RangeVoting.org. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2016-12-11. The evidence surveyed here currently suggests that the "best" scale for human voters should have 10 levels
  14. ↑ "Better "Soft Quorum" Rule". RangeVoting.org. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2016-12-11.
  15. ↑ "How Not To Sort By Average Rating". evanmiller.org. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2016-12-11. Average rating works fine if you always have a ton of ratings, but suppose item 1 has 2 positive ratings and 0 negative ratings. ...
  16. 1 2 Michel Balinski and Rida Laraki (2007). "A theory of measuring, electing, and ranking — PNAS". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 104 (21): 8720–8725. doi:10.1073/pnas.0702634104. PMC 1885569. PMID 17496140. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2009-08-03.
  17. ↑ Laslier, Jean-François (2019). "The strange majority judgment". Revue Économique. 70 (4): 569–588. doi:10.3917/reco.pr2.0126.
  18. ↑ "Equal Vote Coalition". สืบค้นเมื่อ 2017-04-05.
  19. ↑ "Google Groups". groups.google.com. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2017-04-05.
  20. ↑ "Score Runoff Voting: The New Voting Method that Could Save Our Democratic Process". IVN.us. 2016-12-08. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2017-04-05.
  21. ↑ "Strategic SRV? - Equal Vote Coalition". Equal Vote Coalition. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2017-04-05.
  22. ↑ Hillinger, Claude (2005-05-01). "The Case for Utilitarian Voting". Universitätsbibliothek der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (ภาษาอังกฤษ). doi:10.5282/ubm/epub.653. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2018-05-15. Specific UV rules that have been proposed are approval voting, allowing the scores 0, 1; range voting, allowing all numbers in an interval as scores; evaluative voting, allowing the scores -1, 0, 1.
  23. ↑ "Should you be using a more expressive voting system?". VoteUp app. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2018-05-15. Score Voting -- it's just like range voting except the scores are discrete instead of spanning a continuous range.
  24. ↑ "Good criteria support range voting". RangeVoting.org. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2018-05-15. Definition 1: For us "Range voting" shall mean the following voting method. Each voter provides as her vote, a set of real number scores, each in [0,1], one for each candidate. The candidate with greatest score-sum, is elected.
  25. ↑ Smith, Warren D. (December 2000). "Range Voting" (PDF). The "range voting" system is as follows. In a c-candidate election, you select a vector of c real numbers, each of absolute value ≤1, as your vote. E.g. you could vote (+1, −1, +.3, −.9, +1) in a 5-candidate election. The vote-vectors are summed to get a c-vector x and the winner is the i such that xi is maximum.

ใกล้เคียง

ระบบการทรงตัว ระบบการได้ยิน ระบบการเห็น ระบบการลงคะแนน ระบบกำหนดตำแหน่งบนโลก ระบบการนำไฟฟ้าหัวใจ ระบบการลงคะแนนแบบคะแนนรวม ระบบการออกเสียงภาษาบาลี ระบบการลงคะแนนแบบผสม ระบบกระทรวงวัฒนธรรมเกาหลี 2000

แหล่งที่มา

WikiPedia: ระบบการลงคะแนนแบบคะแนนรวม http://independentpoliticalreport.com/2017/06/utah... http://RangeVote.com http://www.socialchoiceandbeyond.com/scabpage38.ht... //pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17496140 //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1885569 http://scorevoting.net/WarrenSmithPages/homepage/r... http://bolson.org/voting/essay.html //doi.org/10.1007%2F978-3-642-02839-7_3 //doi.org/10.1007%2FBF01726327 //doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.electstud.2013.11.003