อ้างอิง ของ กรณีพิพาทกัศมีร์

  1. Yahuda, Michael (2 June 2002). "China and the Kashmir crisis". BBC. สืบค้นเมื่อ 22 March 2019.
  2. Chang, I-wei Jennifer (9 February 2017). "China's Kashmir Policies and Crisis Management in South Asia". United States Institute of Peace. สืบค้นเมื่อ 22 March 2019.
  3. 1 2
  4. Hobbs, Joseph J. (13 March 2008). World Regional Geography. CengageBrain. p. 314. ISBN 978-0495389507.
  5. Ie Ess Wor Reg Geog W/Cd. Thomson Learning EMEA. 2002. ISBN 9780534168100. India now holds about 55% of the old state of Kashmir, Pakistan 30%, and China 15%.
  6. Margolis, Eric (2004). War at the Top of the World: The Struggle for Afghanistan, Kashmir and Tibet (paperback ed.). Routledge. p. 56. ISBN 9781135955595.
  7. Malik, V. P. (2010). Kargil from Surprise to Victory (paperback ed.). HarperCollins Publishers India. p. 54. ISBN 9789350293133.
  8. "Kashmir: region, Indian subcontinent". Encyclopædia Britannica. สืบค้นเมื่อ 16 July 2016.
  9. "Jammu & Kashmir". European Foundation for South Asian Studies. สืบค้นเมื่อ 4 May 2020.
  10. Snow, Shawn (19 September 2016). "Analysis: Why Kashmir Matters". The Diplomat. สืบค้นเมื่อ 4 May 2020.
  11. Ruiz Estrada, Mario Arturo; Koutronas, Evangelos; Khan, Alam; Angathevar, Baskaran (2018). "Economic Dynamics of Territorial Military Conflicts: The Case of Kashmir". Journal of Strategic Studies (in อังกฤษ). doi:10.2139/ssrn.3102745. ISSN 1556-5068. The Kashmir conflict has become the apple of discord primarily between India and Pakistan, and secondarily with China, since their first year of independence. [...] Today, India administers approximately 43 percent of the region (Jammu, the Kashmir Valley, Ladakh, and the Siachen Glacier); Pakistan administers approximately 37 percent of the region (Azad Kashmir and Gilgit- Baltistan); and China administers the rest 20 percent of the region (Demchok district, the Shaksgam Valley, and the Aksai Chin region).
  12. Copland, Ian (Spring 2003), "War and Diplomacy in Kashmir: 1947-48 by C. Dasgupta (review)", Pacific Affairs, 76 (1): 144–145, JSTOR 40024025: "As is well known, this Hindu-ruled Muslim majority state could conceivably have joined either India or Pakistan, but procrastinated about making a choice until a tribal invasion - the term is not contentious - forced the ruler's hand."
  13. Lyon, Peter (1 January 2008). Conflict Between India and Pakistan: An Encyclopedia (in อังกฤษ). ABC-CLIO. p. 80. ISBN 9781576077122.
  14. "Kashmir | History, People, & Conflict". Encyclopedia Britannica. Archived from the original on 30 April 2015.
  15. "Simla Agreement". Bilateral/Multilateral Documents. Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India. สืบค้นเมื่อ 27 September 2013.
  16. Fortna, Virginia (2004). Peace time: cease-fire agreements and the durability of peace. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-11512-2.

ใกล้เคียง

กรณีพิพาทพรมแดนไทย–กัมพูชา กรณีพิพาทอินโดจีน กรณีพิพาทหมู่เกาะคูริล กรณีพิพาทอโยธยา กรณีพิพาทกู่เต็งนาโย่ง กรณีพิพาทชื่อทะเลญี่ปุ่น กรณีพิพาทหมู่เกาะเซ็งกากุ กรณีพิพาทกัศมีร์ กรณีพิพาทเปดราบรังกา กรณีพิพาทกุญแจเข้ารหัสเอเอซีเอส

แหล่งที่มา

WikiPedia: กรณีพิพาทกัศมีร์ http://www.mea.gov.in/bilateral-documents.htm?dtl/... //doi.org/10.2139%2Fssrn.3102745 //www.jstor.org/stable/40024025 //www.worldcat.org/issn/1556-5068 http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/2020788.stm https://www.britannica.com/place/Kashmir-region-In... https://books.google.com/books?id=vLwOck15eboC&pg=... https://books.google.com/books?id=yAgGHnENHjoC&pg=... https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=3102745 https://thediplomat.com/2016/09/analysis-why-kashm...