อ้างอิง ของ โหราศาสตร์กับวิทยาศาสตร์

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Zarka, Philippe (2011). "Astronomy and astrology". Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union. 5 (S260): 420–425. doi:10.1017/S1743921311002602.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Bennett, Jeffrey; Donohue, Megan; Schneider, Nicholas; Voit, Mark (2007). The cosmic perspective (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Pearson/Addison-Wesley. pp. 82–84. ISBN 0-8053-9283-1.
  3. ↑ Hansson, Sven Ove; Zalta, Edward N. "Science and Pseudo-Science". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2012-07-06.
  4. ↑ Hartmann, P; Reuter, M.; Nyborga, H. (2006-05). "The relationship between date of birth and individual differences in personality and general intelligence: A large-scale study". Personality and Individual Differences. 40 (7): 1349–1362. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.11.017. To optimise the chances of finding even remote relationships between date of birth and individual differences in personality and intelligence we further applied two different strategies. The first one was based on the common chronological concept of time (e.g. month of birth and season of birth). The second strategy was based on the (pseudo-scientific) concept of astrology (e.g. Sun Signs, The Elements, and astrological gender), as discussed in the book Astrology: Science or superstition? by Eysenck and Nias (1982). Check date values in: |date= (help)
  5. ↑ Vishveshwara, edited by S.K. Biswas, D.C.V. Mallik, C.V. (1989). Cosmic perspectives : essays dedicated to the memory of M.K.V. Bappu (1. publ. ed.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-34354-2.CS1 maint: extra text: authors list (link)
  6. ↑ ed. by Peter D. Asquith (1978). Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, vol. 1. Dordrecht u.a.: Reidel u.a. ISBN 978-0-917586-05-7.CS1 maint: extra text: authors list (link)
    • "Chapter 7: Science and Technology: Public Attitudes and Understanding". science and engineering indicators 2006. National Science Foundation. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2012-07-28. About three-fourths of Americans hold at least one pseudoscientific belief; i.e., they believed in at least 1 of the 10 survey items[29]" ..." Those 10 items were extrasensory perception (ESP), that houses can be haunted, ghosts/that spirits of dead people can come back in certain places/situations, telepathy/communication between minds without using traditional senses, clairvoyance/the power of the mind to know the past and predict the future, astrology/that the position of the stars and planets can affect people's lives, that people can communicate mentally with someone who has died, witches, reincarnation/the rebirth of the soul in a new body after death, and channeling/allowing a "spirit-being" to temporarily assume control of a body.
  7. 1 2 3 4 "Objections to Astrology: A Statement by 186 Leading Scientists". The Humanist, September/October 1975. Archived from the original on 2009-03-18.
    • The Humanist, volume 36, no.5 (1976).
    • Bok, Bart J.; Lawrence E. Jerome; Paul Kurtz (1982). "Objections to Astrology: A Statement by 186 Leading Scientists". ใน Patrick Grim (ed.). Philosophy of Science and the Occult. Albany: State University of New York Press. pp. 14–18. ISBN 0-87395-572-2.
  8. ↑ "Ariz. Astrology School Accredited". The Washington Post. 2001-08-27.
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Allum, Nick (2010-12-013). "What Makes Some People Think Astrology Is Scientific?". Science Communication. 33 (3): 341–366. doi:10.1177/1075547010389819. This underlies the "Barnum effect". Named after the 19th-century showman Phineas T. Barnum, whose circus act provided "a little something for everyone", it refers to the idea that people believe a statement about their personality that is vague or trivial if they think that it derives from some systematic procedure tailored especially for them (Dickson & Kelly, 1985; Furnham & Schofield, 1987; Rogers & Soule, 2009; Wyman & Vyse, 2008). For example, the more birth detail is used in an astrological prediction or horoscope, the more credulous people tend to be (Furnham, 1991). However, confirmation bias means that people do not tend to pay attention to other information that might disconfirm the credibility of the predictions. Check date values in: |date= (help)
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Pigliucci, Massimo (2010). Nonsense on stilts : how to tell science from bunk ([Online-Ausg.]. ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 9780226667850.
  11. 1 2 3 4 5 Hoskin, edited by Michael (2003). The Cambridge concise history of astronomy (Printing 2003. ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0521572916.CS1 maint: extra text: authors list (link)
  12. ↑ Evans, James (1998). The history & practice of ancient astronomy. New York: Oxford Univ. Press. ISBN 9780195095395.
  13. 1 2 Arjomand, Kamran (1997). "The Emergence of Scientific Modernity in Iran: Controversies Surrounding Astrology and Modern Astronomy in the Mid-Nineteenth Century". Iranian Studies. Taylor and Francis, for the International Society for Iranian Studies. 30: 5–24. doi:10.1080/00210869708701857.
  14. 1 2 Thornton, Stephen; Zalta, Edward N. (older edition). "Karl Popper". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  15. 1 2 3 4 5 Pigliucci, Massimo; Boudry, Maarten (2013). Philosophy of pseudoscience : reconsidering the demarcation problem. Chicago [u.a.]: Univ. of Chicago Press. ISBN 9780226051796.
  16. 1 2 3 4 Kuhn, Thomas (1970). Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (ed.). Proceedings of the International Colloquium in the Philosophy of Science [held at Bedford college, Regent's Park, London, from July 11th to 17th 1965] (Reprint. ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. ISBN 0521096235.
  17. 1 2 Popper, Karl (2004). Conjectures and refutations : the growth of scientific knowledge (Reprinted. ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-28594-1.
    • The relevant piece is also published in, Schick Jr, Theodore, (2000). Readings in the philosophy of science : from positivism to postmodernism. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Pub. pp. 33–39. ISBN 0-7674-0277-4.CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link)
  18. ↑ Cogan, Robert (1998). Critical thinking : step by step. Lanham, Md.: University Press of America. ISBN 0761810676.
  19. 1 2 Wright, Peter (1975). "Astrology and Science in Seventeenth-Century England". Social Studies of Science. 5: 399–422. doi:10.1177/030631277500500402.
  20. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Thagard, Paul R. (1978). "Why Astrology is a Pseudoscience". Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. The University of Chicago Press. 1: 223–234.
  21. ↑ Hurley, Patrick (2005). A concise introduction to logic (9th ed.). Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth. ISBN 0534585051.
  22. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 James, Edward W. (1982). Patrick Grim (ed.). Philosophy of science and the occult. Albany: State University of New York Press. ISBN 0873955722.
  23. ↑ Muller, Richard (2010). "Web site of Richard A. Muller, Professor in the Department of Physics at the University of California at Berkeley,". สืบค้นเมื่อ 2011-08-02.My former student Shawn Carlson published in Nature magazine the definitive scientific test of Astrology.
    Maddox, Sir John (1995). "John Maddox, editor of the science journal Nature, commenting on Carlson's test". สืบค้นเมื่อ 2011-08-02. "... a perfectly convincing and lasting demonstration."
  24. 1 2 3 Smith, Jonathan C. (2010). Pseudoscience and extraordinary claims of the paranormal : a critical thinker's toolkit. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN 978-1-4051-8123-5.
  25. 1 2 3 4 Carlson, Shawn (1985). "A double-blind test of astrology" (PDF). Nature. 318 (6045): 419–425. Bibcode:1985Natur.318..419C. doi:10.1038/318419a0.
  26. ↑ Matthews, Robert (2003-08-17). "Astrologers fail to predict proof they are wrong". The Telegraph. London. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2012-07-13.
  27. 1 2 3 4 Dean G., Kelly, I. W. (2003). "Is Astrology Relevant to Consciousness and Psi?". Journal of Consciousness Studies. 10 (6–7): 175–198.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  28. ↑ Martens, Ronny; Trachet, Tim (1998). Making sense of astrology. Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books. ISBN 1-57392-218-8.
  29. 1 2 Gauquelin, Michel (1955). L'influence des astres : étude critique et expérimentale. Paris: Éditions du Dauphin.
  30. ↑ Pont, Graham (2004). "Philosophy and Science of Music in Ancient Greece". Nexus Network Journal. 6 (1): 17–29. doi:10.1007/s00004-004-0003-x.
  31. 1 2 Carroll, Robert Todd (2003). The skeptic's dictionary : a collection of strange beliefs, amusing deceptions, and dangerous delusions. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. ISBN 0-471-27242-6.
  32. ↑ Benski, Claude, with a commentary by Jan Willem Nienhuys; และคณะ (1995). The "Mars effect : a French test of over 1,000 sports champions. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books. ISBN 0-87975-988-7. Explicit use of et al. in: |last= (help); Explicit use of et al. in: |author2= (help)
  33. ↑ Giomataris, Ioannis. "Nature Obituary Georges Charpak (1924-2010)". Nature. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2012-05-13.
  34. 1 2 3 Charpak, Georges; Holland, Henri Broch; translated by Bart K. (2004). Debunked! : ESP, telekinesis, and other pseudoscience. Baltimore u.a.9: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press. pp. 6, 7. ISBN 0-8018-7867-5.CS1 maint: location (link)
  35. ↑ "British Physicist Debunks Astrology in Indian Lecture". Associated Press.
  36. 1 2 3 Chris, French (2012-02-07). "Astrologers and other inhabitants of parallel universes". 2012-02-07. London: The Guardian. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2012-07-08.
  37. 1 2 Randi, James. "UK MEDIA NONSENSE — AGAIN". 2004-05-21. Swift, Online newspaper of the JREF. Archived from the original on 2012-07-22. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2012-07-08.
  38. ↑ Plait, Phil. "Astrology". Bad Astronomy. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2014-03-13.
  39. 1 2 editor, Michael Shermer, (2002). The Skeptic encyclopedia of pseudoscience. Santa Barbara, Calif.: ABC-CLIO. p. 241. ISBN 1-57607-653-9.CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link) CS1 maint: extra text: authors list (link)
  40. ↑ Samuels, Andrew (1990). Jung and the post-Jungians. London: Tavistock/Routledge. p. 80. ISBN 0-203-35929-1.
  41. 1 2 "Season of birth may have long-term effects on personality, study suggests". ScienceDaily. 2010-12-10. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2016-01-22.
  42. ↑ Gonzalez, edited by Jean-Paul Caverni, Jean-Marc Fabre, Michel (1990). Cognitive biases. Amsterdam: North-Holland. ISBN 0-444-88413-0.CS1 maint: extra text: authors list (link)
  43. 1 2 3 Nickerson, Raymond S. Nickerson (1998). "Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises". Review of General Psychology. 2. 2 (2): 175–220. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175.
  44. ↑ Eysenck, H.J.; Nias, D.K.B. (1984). Astrology : science or superstition?. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books. ISBN 0-14-022397-5.
  45. ↑ Paul, Annie Murphy (2005). The cult of personality testing : how personality tests are leading us to miseducate our children, mismanage our companies, and misunderstand ourselves (1st pbk. ed.). New York, N.Y.: Free Press. ISBN 0-7432-8072-5.
  46. 1 2 3 4 Rogers, P.; Soule, J. (2009-03-05). "Cross-Cultural Differences in the Acceptance of Barnum Profiles Supposedly Derived From Western Versus Chinese Astrology". Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 40 (3): 381–399. doi:10.1177/0022022109332843. The Barnum effect is a robust phenomenon, having been demonstrated in clinical, occupational, educational, forensic, and military settings as well as numerous ostensibly paranormal contexts (Dickson & Kelly, 1985; Furnham & Schofield, 1987; Snyder, Shenkel & Lowery, 1977; Thiriart, 1991). In the first Barnum study, Forer (1949) administered, astrological believers deemed a Barnum profile supposedly derived from astrology was a better description of their own personality than did astrological skeptics.This was true regardless of the respondent's ethnicity or apparent profile source. This reinforces still further the view that individuals who endorse astrological beliefs are prone to judging the legitimacy and usefulness of horoscopes according to their a priori expectations. line feed character in |quote= at position 508 (help)
  47. ↑ Wunder, Edgar (2003-12-01). "Self-attribution, sun-sign traits, and the alleged role of favourableness as a moderator variable: long-term effect or artefact?". Personality and Individual Differences. 35 (8): 1783–1789. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00002-3. The effect was replicated several times (Eysenck & Nias 1981,1982; Fichten & Sunerton, 1983; Jackson, 1979; Kelly, 1982; Smithers and Cooper, 1978), even if no reference to astrology was made until the debriefing of the subjects (Hamilton, 1995; Van Rooij, 1994, 1999), or if the data were gathered originally for a purpose that has nothing to do with astrology (Clarke, Gabriels, and Barnes, 1996; Van Rooij, Brak, & Commandeur, 1988), but the effect is stronger when a cue is given to the subjects that the study is about astrology (Van Rooij 1994). Early evidence for sun-sign derived self-attribution effects has already been reported by Silverman (1971) and Delaney & Woodyard (1974). In studies with subjects unfamiliar with the meaning of the astrological sun-sign symbolism, no effect was observed (Fourie, 1984; Jackson & Fiebert, 1980; Kanekar & Mukherjee, 1972; Mohan, Bhandari, & Meena, 1982; Mohan and Gulati, 1986; Saklofske, Kelly, & McKerracher, 1982; Silverman & Whitmer, 1974; Veno & Pamment, 1979).
  48. 1 2 3 Cary J. Nederman and James Wray Goulding (Winter 1981). "Popular Occultism and Critical Social Theory: Exploring Some Themes in Adorno's Critique of Astrology and the Occult". Sociological Analysis. 42.
  49. ↑ Theodor W. Adorno (Spring 1974). "The Stars Down to Earth: The Los Angeles Times Astrology Column". Telos. 1974 (19): 13–90. doi:10.3817/0374019013.
  50. 1 2 3 Jackson, T. (2011-12-020). "When balance is bias". BMJ. 343 (dec19 2): d8006–d8006. doi:10.1136/bmj.d8006. Check date values in: |date= (help)
  51. ↑ Robbins, Martin (2011-01-24). "Astrologers angered by stars". The Guardian. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2013-09-07.
  52. ↑ Science and Technology Indicators 2014 (PDF). National Science Foundation.

ใกล้เคียง

แหล่งที่มา

WikiPedia: โหราศาสตร์กับวิทยาศาสตร์ http://astrology-and-science.com/ http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/astrology.htm... http://www.beliefnet.com/story/63/story_6346_1.htm... http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v467/n7319/fu... http://scx.sagepub.com/content/early/2010/12/04/10... http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/12/10120... http://www.sixtysymbols.com/videos/declination.htm http://journal.telospress.com/content/1974/19/13.s... http://www.theguardian.com/science/the-lay-scienti... http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/aponline/2001...